What are the major differences between Emacs Lisp

Question

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.

---

Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.

Closed 4 years ago.

I want to learn the lisp language, since my editor is emacs, I prefer emacs lisp.

Can anyone give me some suggestions to learn lisp, emacs lisp, or common lisp?

What are the major differences between those two?

Answer 1

There's quite a bit of crossover, especially at the beginner level, so whichever you start with will mostly transfer to the other.

Some of the major differences:

• ELisp traditionally used dynamic scoping rules; Common Lisp uses lexical scoping rules. With dynamic scoping, a function can access local variables declared in calling functions and has generally fallen out of favor. Starting with Emacs 24, Emacs allows optional lexical scoping on a file-by-file basis (and all files in the core distribution are progressively being converted).

• Dynamically scoped ELisp doesn't have closures, which makes composing functions and currying difficult. There's a apply-partially function that works similarly to currying. Note that the lexical-let form introduced in Emacs 24 makes it possible to produce closures via lexical scoping.

• Much of the Common Lisp library that has been built up over time isn't available in elisp. A subset is provided by the elisp cl package

• elisp doesn't do tail-call optimization.

Answer 2

These Emacs-Wiki pages offer some info about the relation between the two Lisps and their differences:

• http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/CommonLisp
• http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EmacsLisp
• http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/EmacsLispLimitations