Test planning/documentation/management tools

2020-05-15 12:50发布

I'm looking for a good, preferably free, test planning and documentation tool. Ideally something that will keep track of which tests have been run against which software version, with reporting ability. There's a whole bunch of tools listed here but are there any others, and which ones have you had the best experience with? (You do run tests, right?)

UPDATE 2008-01-29

So far TestLink and Fitness have been mentioned. A related question yielded also a link to the ReadySet project, an open collection of software planning documentation templates.

I have used TestLink and found it okayish, but I cannot say I enjoyed using it. Has anyone had any experience with Fitnesse? Or are there any other free tools out there that you have used and found satisfactory?

11条回答
冷血范
2楼-- · 2020-05-15 13:12

You should definitely try out Klaros-Testmanagement http://www.klaros-testmanagement.com which has an free, unrestricted Community Edition.

查看更多
地球回转人心会变
3楼-- · 2020-05-15 13:13

PractiTest is a very good option. Not free but very affordable - http://www.practitest.com

查看更多
Fickle 薄情
4楼-- · 2020-05-15 13:14

Quality Center. It's expensive, but it is the best

查看更多
来,给爷笑一个
5楼-- · 2020-05-15 13:14

I'm with Patrick - good ol' office tools :)

I just write mine in Microsoft Word

This is the structure I developed: Writing a System Test Plan.

查看更多
看我几分像从前
6楼-- · 2020-05-15 13:19

We use a home-grown Access database.

This database keeps track of our requirements, test cases, test plan and test runs. We're able to produce an up-to-date RVTM, keep track of progress against the plan, and assign tasks to testers. We integrated it with Outlook, so each tester is assigned a task from the plan by the QA lead. When they're complete, they just tick it off in Outlook and it updates the database.

For our small team of testers it works nicely, and we're free to customize it however we want.

查看更多
The star\"
7楼-- · 2020-05-15 13:20

I've used QualityCenter/TestDirectory for a long time.

I'm now using testlink and I must say that I prefer QualityCenter/TestDirectory by far, even if it based on some buggy ActiveX control.

QualityCenter/TestDirectory is more easier to use and the interface is quite better.

TestLink and QualityCenter/TestDirectory are mainly for manual test case (however, you can use Quick Test Pro on QualityCenter/TestDirectory to automatize your tests).

Fitnesse is another kind of tool in my mind : basically, you write your test case on a wiki and link that to a JUnit test. Another tools like that are GreenPepper, Concordion, etc.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答