I'm looking for a simple example of how to implement a factory class, but without the use of a Switch or an If-Then statement. All the examples I can find use one. For example, how could one modify this simple example (below) so that the actual factory does not depend on the Switch? It seems to me that this example violates the Open/Close principle. I'd like to be able to add concrete classes ('Manager', 'Clerk', 'Programmer', etc) without having to modify the factory class.
Thanks!
class Program
{
abstract class Position
{
public abstract string Title { get; }
}
class Manager : Position
{
public override string Title
{
get { return "Manager"; }
}
}
class Clerk : Position
{
public override string Title
{
get { return "Clerk"; }
}
}
class Programmer : Position
{
public override string Title
{
get { return "Programmer"; }
}
}
static class Factory
{
public static Position Get(int id)
{
switch (id)
{
case 0: return new Manager();
case 1: return new Clerk();
case 2: return new Programmer();
default: return new Programmer();
}
}
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
for (int i = 0; i <= 2; i++)
{
var position = Factory.Get(i);
Console.WriteLine("Where id = {0}, position = {1} ", i, position.Title);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
UPDATE:
Wow! Thanks everyone! I have learned a ton. After revewing all the feedback, I blended a few of the answers and came up with this. I'd be open to further dialog about a better way to do this.
class Program
{
public interface IPosition
{
string Title { get; }
}
class Manager : IPosition
{
public string Title
{
get { return "Manager"; }
}
}
class Clerk : IPosition
{
public string Title
{
get { return "Clerk"; }
}
}
class Programmer : IPosition
{
public string Title
{
get { return "Programmer"; }
}
}
static class PositionFactory
{
public static T Create<T>() where T : IPosition, new()
{
return new T();
}
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
IPosition position0 = PositionFactory.Create<Manager>();
Console.WriteLine("0: " + position0.Title);
IPosition position1 = PositionFactory.Create<Clerk>();
Console.WriteLine("1: " + position1.Title);
IPosition position2 = PositionFactory.Create<Programmer>();
Console.WriteLine("1: " + position2.Title);
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
Another Edit:
It's also possible to create an instance of the Interface using an unknown type:
static class PositionFactory
{
public static IPosition Create(string positionName)
{
Type type = Type.GetType(positionName);
return (IPosition)Activator.CreateInstance(type);
}
}
Which could then be called as follows:
IPosition position = PositionFactory.Create("Manager");
Console.WriteLine(position.Title);
How about this (no Dictionary required and note that you will get an syntax error if your try to
Create<Position>()
):EDIT - Updated to use an IPosition interface implemented explicitly. Only instances of IPosition can access the member functions (e.g.
<implementation of Manager>.Title
will not compile).EDIT #2 Factory.Create should return an IPosition not T when using the interface properly.
Why overcomplicate things? Here is one simple solution:
Here is how to do this without using factory class at all:
You could make use of custom attributes and reflection.
In your factory you could then get all classes that inherit from
Position
and find the one that has thePositionType
attribute with the correct value.Used like this: