I have a model with a FileField. I want to unittest it. django test framework has great ways to manage database and emails. Is there something similar for FileFields?
How can I make sure that the unittests are not going to pollute the real application?
Thanks in advance
PS: My question is almost a duplicate of Django test FileField using test fixtures but it doesn't have an accepted answer. Just want to re-ask if something new on this topic.
There are several ways you could tackle this but they're all ugly since unit tests are supposed to be isolated but files are all about durable changes.
My unit tests don't run on a system with production data so it's been easy to simply reset the upload directory after each run with something like
git reset --hard
. This approach is in some ways the best simply because it involves no code changes and is guaranteed to work as long as you start with good test data.If you don't actually need to do anything with that file after testing your model's save method, I'd recommend using python's excellent Mock library to completely fake the
File
instance (i.e. something likemock_file = Mock(spec=django.core.files.File); mock_file.read.return_value = "fake file contents"
) so you can completely avoid changes to your file handling logic. The Mock library has a couple of ways to globally patch Django's File class within a test method which is about as easy as this will get.If you need to have a real file (i.e. for serving as part of a test, processing with an external script, etc.) you can use something similar to Mirko's example and create a File object after making sure it'll be stored somewhere appropriate - here are three ways to do that:
settings.MEDIA_ROOT
point to a temporary directory (see the Python tempfile module'smkdtemp
function). This works fine as long as you have something like a separateSTATIC_ROOT
which you use for the media files which are part of your source code.MEDIA_ROOT
.Edit: mock object library is new in python version 3.3. For older python versions check Michael Foord's version
I normally test filefields in models using doctest
If I need to I also test file uploads with test clients.
As for fixtures, I simply copy the files i need in a test folder, after modifying the paths in the fixture.
e.g.
In a fixture containing models with filefiels pointing to a directory named "audio", you replace "audio": "audio/audio.wav" with "audio": "audio/test/audio.wav" .
Now all you have to do is copy the test folder, with the necessary files, in "audio" in the test setUp and then delete it in tearDown.
Not the cleanest way ever i think, but that's what i do.
If you just want to create an object that requires FileField and don't want to use this field then you can just pass any (existing or not) relative path like this:
Then it's ready for use.
Django provides a great way to do this - use a
SimpleUploadedFile
or aTemporaryUploadedFile
.SimpleUploadedFile
is generally the simpler option if all you need to store is some sentinel data:It's one of django's magical features-that-don't-show-up-in-the-docs :). However it is referred to here and implemented here.
Limitations
Note that you can only put
bytes
in aSimpleUploadedFile
since it's implemented usingBytesIO
behind the scenes. If you need more realistic, file-like behavior you can useTemporaryUploadedFile
.For Python 2
If you're stuck on python 2, skip the
b
prefix in the content: