It is frequent in my practice that a variable/argument is to store a type of something (as an enumeration value usually). And it usually makes no sense to specify an entity class in the name (like userType when a function is onlu intended to handle users). Is there a way I can use the "type" word for my needs instead of using scaffolds like "tipe", "kind", "somethingType" instead of it? The actual Scala type
keyword is of such a rare use - it would be nice If I could undefine it (as a keyword) in the most of my code files.
相关问题
- Unusual use of the new keyword
- Get Runtime Type picked by implicit evidence
- What's the point of nonfinal singleton objects
- PlayFramework: how to transform each element of a
- Error in Scala Compiler: java.lang.AssertionError:
相关文章
- es 单字段多分词器时,textField.keyword无法高亮
- Gatling拓展插件开发,check(bodyString.saveAs("key"))怎么实现
- RDF libraries for Scala [closed]
- Why is my Dispatching on Actors scaled down in Akk
- How do you run cucumber with Scala 2.11 and sbt 0.
- GRPC: make high-throughput client in Java/Scala
- Setting up multiple test folders in a SBT project
- Testing request with CSRF Token in Play framework
You can escape with backticks: