In order to call my Web API method until no more data is returned (I'm fetching it in batches, to keep each result set small, due to the 98-lb-weakling persona of the client (Windows CE handheld device)), I'm using this code:
while (moreRecordsExist)
{
redemptionsList.redemptions.Clear();
string uri = String.Format("http://platypus:28642/api/Redemptions/{0}/{1}", lastIdFetched, RECORDS_TO_FETCH);
var webRequest = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create(uri);
webRequest.Method = "GET";
using (var webResponse = (HttpWebResponse)webRequest.GetResponse())
{
if (webResponse.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.OK)
{
var reader = new StreamReader(webResponse.GetResponseStream());
string s = reader.ReadToEnd();
var arr = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<JArray>(s);
if (null == arr) break;
foreach (JObject obj in arr)
{
id = obj.Value<int?>("Id") ?? 0;
var _redemptionId = obj.Value<string>("RedemptionId") ?? "";
var _redemptionItemId = obj.Value<string>("RedemptionItemId") ?? "";
var _redemptionName = obj.Value<string>("RedemptionName") ?? "";
double _redemptionAmount = obj.Value<double?>("RedemptionAmount") ?? 0.0;
var _redemptionDept = obj.Value<string>("RedemptionDept") ?? "";
var _redemptionSubdept = obj.Value<string>("RedemptionSubDept") ?? "";
redemptionsList.redemptions.Add(new HHSUtils.Redemption
{
Id = id,
RedemptionId = _redemptionId,
RedemptionItemId = _redemptionItemId,
RedemptionName = _redemptionName,
RedemptionAmount = _redemptionAmount,
RedemptionDept = _redemptionDept,
RedemptionSubDept = _redemptionSubdept,
});
} // foreach
} // if ((webResponse.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.OK) && (webResponse.ContentLength > 2))
} // using HttpWebResponse
int recordsAdded = LocalDBUtils.BulkInsertRedemptions(redemptionsList.redemptions);
totalRecordsAdded += recordsAdded;
//moreRecordsExist = (recordsToFetch > (totalRecordsAdded));
lastIdFetched = id;
} // while
This works (if I check webResponse for null, it crashes with a NullReferenceException), but I don't really like my while loop, as it is never reached once moreRecordsExist is assigned false. So, I set the Resharper hounds loose on it to see if it had a better suggestion, but it just tells me, "Expression is always true" for that line, and the suggested "fix" for this is to change it to "while (true)"
I fail to see how that is much of an improvement, though.
Is there a way I can accomplish the same thing with a more sensible construct?
Consider using a do..while() loop. This gets you around the "while-loop-is-never-reached" problem... it will always run at least once, no matter what moreRecordsExist is set to.
You break out the loop with a
break
statement immediately after assigningfalse
tomoreRecordsExist
variable, so its value will never be false in the beginning of the loop. You can make a change as ReSharper suggests and get rid ofmoreRecordsExist
variable:Why not return some metadata with response, e.g. {Pages:10} ? Then you know exactly how many records you're going after.