I am trying to get the values of the top three rows for a person to all display in one row.
My data looks like this:
id co_number client_no Client_name taken_date taken_value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
270103 12 1111 John Doe 6/7/11 8:45 AM 108
270100 12 1111 John Doe 5/3/11 10:49 AM 109
270097 12 1111 John Doe 4/4/11 1:58 PM 109
270094 12 1111 John Doe 3/1/11 9:04 AM 106
270091 12 1111 John Doe 2/1/11 8:47 AM 105
270088 12 1111 John Doe 1/4/11 9:10 AM 106
270120 12 2222 Jane Smith 6/7/11 9:06 AM 215
270117 12 2222 Jane Smith 5/3/11 2:01 PM 216
270114 12 2222 Jane Smith 4/4/11 2:08 PM 214
270111 12 2222 Jane Smith 3/1/11 9:27 AM 209
270159 12 3333 John Adams 6/7/11 9:45 AM 205
270156 12 3333 John Adams 5/3/11 2:12 PM 203
270153 12 3333 John Adams 4/4/11 1:42 PM 202
270150 12 3333 John Adams 3/1/11 10:32 AM 198
I want the data to display like this (Date1 being the most recent, then Date2, then Date3):
co# Name Date1 Value1 Date2 Value2 Date3 Value3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12 John Doe 2011-06-07 08:45 108.0 2011-05-03 10:49 109.0 2011-04-04 13:58 109.0
Here is what I have so far. It works but it's slow (takes 30 secs to return one co_number) so I'm wondering if there is a better more efficient way of doing this.
select
vmain.co_nmber, vmain.Client_name, vmain.Taken_date, vmain.Taken_value
, (select top 1 Taken_date from vital vdate where vdate.co_nmber=vmain.co_nmber and vdate.Medical_Record_Number=vmain.Medical_Record_Number and vdate.Taken_date < vmain.Taken_date order by vdate.Taken_date desc) as date2
, (select top 1 Taken_value from vital v_value where v_value.co_nmber=vmain.co_nmber and v_value.Medical_Record_Number=vmain.Medical_Record_Number and v_value.Taken_date < vmain.Taken_date order by v_value.Taken_date desc) as value2
, (select top 1 Taken_date from vital vdate where vdate.co_nmber=vmain.co_nmber and vdate.Medical_Record_Number=vmain.Medical_Record_Number and vdate.Taken_date < (select top 1 Taken_date from vital vdate where vdate.co_nmber=vmain.co_nmber and vdate.Medical_Record_Number=vmain.Medical_Record_Number and vdate.Taken_date < vmain.Taken_date order by vdate.Taken_date desc) order by vdate.Taken_date desc) as date3
, (select top 1 Taken_value from vital vvalue where vvalue.co_nmber=vmain.co_nmber and vvalue.Medical_Record_Number=vmain.Medical_Record_Number and vvalue.Taken_date < (select top 1 Taken_date from vital vdate where vdate.co_nmber=vmain.co_nmber and vdate.Medical_Record_Number=vmain.Medical_Record_Number and vdate.Taken_date < vmain.Taken_date order by vdate.Taken_date desc) order by vvalue.Taken_date desc) as value3
from vital as vmain
inner join(
SELECT v.co_nmber, v.Medical_Record_Number, max(v.Taken_date) as Taken_date
FROM Vital v
and v.co_nmber = 12
GROUP BY v.co_nmber, v.Medical_Record_Number
) as vsub on vsub.co_nmber=vmain.co_nmber and vsub.Medical_Record_Number=vmain.Medical_Record_Number and vsub.Taken_date = vmain.Taken_date
and vmain.co_nmber = 12
order by vmain.co_nmber, vmain.Medical_Record_Number, vmain.Taken_date
Help appreciated.
You could number your records per co and client with row_number. After this you can select the first ones and left join the second and third ones. Should be faster.
The slowness may be to using correlated sub-queries in the Select statement. Remember that sub-queries will execute for every record in the table
If you are only going to have a fixed number of values returned using a Temp table (or Table variable) and the Row_Number() Over method will work:
Ok, I updated my answer. Here is a solution that will work based on the query I made earlier:
Ok Claudia. This will first pull all the unique names in the table into a temporary table. It will then iterate through each name. Inside the iteration loop, it will do what my last program will do and pull the needed dates from the top 3 names and insert them into another temporary table. After all the names have been processed, it will then dump the contents of the temporary table, which should be the output you are looking for. I ran this query on my system with the test data you provided and it executed in under 1 second. I know you probably have a lot more rows then I had to work with, but it seems to work pretty well. If you need anything else, let me know and I will modify it accordingly. You are free to add any kind of additional where clauses to the SELECT statements, if needed. You may also need to change some of the data types. I wasn't sure if your taken_value was integer or decimal or whatever. I went with INT, but you can change it to match your needs.
The big question is "What is causing the query to run slowly?"
Is your table indexed appropriately?
Perhaps you could remove one of your computed columns at a time and see how that effects performance.