I researched this quite a bit, but couldn't find a working example how to match nested html tags with attributes. I know it is possible to match balanced/nested innermost tags without attributes (for example a regex for and would be #<div\b[^>]*>(?:(?> [^<]+ ) |<(?!div\b[^>]*>))*?</div>
#x).
However, I would like to see a regex pattern that finds an html tag pair with attributes.
Example: It basically should match
<div class="aaa"> **<div class="aaa">** <div> <div> </div> **</div>** </div>
and not
<div class="aaa"> **<div class="aaa">** <div> <div> **</div>** </div> </div>
Anybody has some ideas?
For testing purposes we could use: http://www.lumadis.be/regex/test_regex.php
PS. Steven mentioned a solution in his blog (actually in a comment), but it doesn't work
http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/match-innermost-html-element
$regex = '/<div\b[^>]+?\bid\s*=\s*"MyID"[^>]*>(?:((?:[^<]++|<(?!\/?div\b[^>]*>))+)|(<div\b[^>]*>(?>(?1)|(?2))*<\/div>))?<\/div>/i';
I built a brief python script to solve the issue of managing nested tags. It runs happily with html and with other, terrible nested syntaxes too, as wiki code. Hyronically, I wrote it to avoid regex! I couldn't understand them at all. :-(. I used that function for anything, it runs very well for html and xml. It's fast too, since it only uses basic string search. I'm very happy to know that regex can't help. :-)
I'd like to share the script, if anyone of you is interested; but consider, I'm not a programmer, I presume that the issue has been solved for a long time!
You can find me at my talk page into it.source: http://it.wikisource.org/wiki/Discussioni_utente:Alex_brollo
Matching innermost matching pairs of
<div>
&</div>
tags, plus their attributes & content:#<div(?:(?!(<div|</div>)).)*</div>#s
The key here is that
(?:(?!STRING).)*
is to strings as[^CHAR]*
is to characters.Credit: https://stackoverflow.com/a/6996274
Example in PHP:
Outputs:
RegEx match open tags except XHTML self-contained tags
And indeed, it is absolutely impossible. HTML has something unique, something magical, which is immune to RegEx.
You can do it recursively, using the same regex but executed while needed. Like this:
This works with cases like:
I found this script here: http://blog.stevenlevithan.com/archives/reverse-recursive-pattern