NOT IN does not produce same results as NOT EXISTS

Question

These are rather basic statements. I have a list of graphics which are linked to items in another table. I want to check how many of the graphics are not in use and can theoretically be deleted.

So first I used the NOT IN clause:

SELECT [GraphicNr]
      ,[Graphicfile]
  FROM [dbo].[Graphic]
 WHERE graphicnr NOT IN (SELECT graphicnr FROM dbo.Komp)

Which gave zero results, which seemed weird to me. After rewriting it to a NOT EXISTS, I got about 600 results:

SELECT [GraphicNr]
      ,[Graphicfile]
  FROM [dbo].[Graphic] a
 WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT graphicnr FROM dbo.komp b WHERE a.GraphicNr = b.GraphicNr)

So I guess I don't really have a problem, since the second statement works, but to my understanding, shouldn't the first one give the same results?

Answer 1

That because of NULL value returned from subquery :

SELECT [GraphicNr], [Graphicfile]
FROM [dbo].[Graphic]
WHERE graphicnr NOT IN (SELECT graphicnr FROM dbo.Komp)

This would produce no records or no rows affected because of graphicnr not in (null) which is not desired output.

So, the NOT EXISTS would not work as the way the IN clause or NOT IN work. It behaves differently then IN or NOT IN clause.

However, you can prevent this by using IS NOT NULL filter in subquery. But the recommended way is to use NOT EXISTS instead.

Answer 2

NOT IN with a subquery has strange behavior. If any row in the subquery returns a NULL value, then no rows are returned. This is due to following the strict semantics of NULL (which means: "I don't know if they are equal").

NOT EXISTS behaves as you would expect. For this reason, I recommend never using NOT IN with a subquery. Always use NOT EXISTS.