What is the worst case time complexity for this al

2020-04-14 09:30发布

procedure matrixvector(n:integer);
var i,j:integer;
begin
  for i<-1 to n do begin
    B[i] = 0;
    C[i] = 0;
    for j<-1 to i do 
      B[i]<- B[i]+ A[i,j];
    for j<-n down to i+1 do
      C[i]<-C[i] + A[i,j]
  end
end;

3条回答
我欲成王,谁敢阻挡
2楼-- · 2020-04-14 09:43

worst case is O(n²).

there are indeed three loops, but not all inside each other, thus giving O(n²).

also, you can clearly see that the inner loops won't go from 1 to n (like the outer loop does). But because this would only change the time complexity by some constant, we can ignore this and say that it is just O(n^2).

This shows that time complexity is a measure saying: your algorithm will scale with this order, and it won't ever take any longer. (faster is however always possible)

for more information about "calculating" the worst case complexity of any algorithm, I can point you to a related question I asked earlier

查看更多
孤傲高冷的网名
3楼-- · 2020-04-14 09:46

O(n^2), if I read it right.

Why you need two inner loops is beyond me. Why not sum B and C in the same loop?

查看更多
贪生不怕死
4楼-- · 2020-04-14 09:57

Just explaining in detail for beginners:

Outermost for loop will run n times (0 to n) Then there are two for loops within the out ermost for loop. First for loop will go from 1 to n (1+2+3+4+.....+n) And the second for loop will go from n to 1 (n+n-1+n-2+....+1)

The summation formula for (1+2+3+4+5+....+n ) is n(n+1)/2

so the total running time can be computed as n + n(n+1)/2 + n(n+1)/2

Observe the highest polynomial in this equation, it is n^2.

We can further simplify this equation and drop the constants and ignore the linear part, which will give us a run time of n^2.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答