Are you referring to the NIO introduced in Java 5.0, 7 years ago? Or the Asynchronous NIO adding in Java 7?
In short the simple answer is that using BufferedReader is much, much simpler and not much slower.
If you must use ByteBuffer, or you want that last bit of performance, you have to read one byte at a time. (And you have handle the situation that only part of the line has been read so you can run out of data in the ByteBuffer before you reach the new line)
BufferedReader's readline() method should be enough. Otherwise you have to read an arbitrary number of bytes and parse for the endline '\n' or \r\n' if it is in windows style line ending
Are you referring to the NIO introduced in Java 5.0, 7 years ago? Or the Asynchronous NIO adding in Java 7?
In short the simple answer is that using BufferedReader is much, much simpler and not much slower.
If you must use ByteBuffer, or you want that last bit of performance, you have to read one byte at a time. (And you have handle the situation that only part of the line has been read so you can run out of data in the ByteBuffer before you reach the new line)
Or for small files you can do this:
BufferedReader's readline() method should be enough. Otherwise you have to read an arbitrary number of bytes and parse for the endline '\n' or \r\n' if it is in windows style line ending