Considering "private" is the default access modifier for class Members, why is the keyword even needed?
相关问题
- Sorting 3 numbers without branching [closed]
- Graphics.DrawImage() - Throws out of memory except
- Generic Generics in Managed C++
- Why am I getting UnauthorizedAccessException on th
- 求获取指定qq 资料的方法
As pointed out by Jon Skeet in his book C# In Depth, there is one place in C# where the private keyword is required to achieve an effect.
If my memory serves correctly, the private keyword is the only way to create a privately scoped property getter or setter, when its opposite has greater than private accessibility. Example:
The private keyword is required to achieve this, because an additional property accessability modifier can only narrow the scope, not widen it. (Otherwise, one might have been able to create a private (by default) property and then add a public modifier.)
Some coding styles recommend that you put all the "public" items first, followed by the "private" items. Without a "private" keyword, you couldn't do it that way around.
Update: I didn't notice the "c#" tag on this so my answer applies more to C++ than to C#.
Using private explicitly signals your intention and leaves clues for others who will support your code ;)
It's for you (and future maintainers), not the compiler.
I usually leave private out but I find it useful for lining up code:
VS:
For completenes. And some people actually prefer to be explicit in their code about the access modifiers on their methods.