Portfolio Optimization constraints Matrix/bvec exp

2020-03-31 04:21发布

I recently got very interested in portfolio optimization and started playing around in R, to create a minimum variance portfolio,

library(quadprog)
Dmat <- matrix(c(356.25808, 12.31581, 261.88302, 12.31581, 27.24840,
18.50515,261.88302, 18.50515,535.45960), nrow=3, ncol=3)
dvec <- matrix(c(9.33, 3.33, 9.07), nrow=3, ncol=1)
A.Equality <- matrix(c(1,1,1), ncol=1)
Amat <- cbind(A.Equality, dvec, diag(3), -diag(3))
bvec <- c(1, 5.2, rep(0, 3), rep(-0.5, 3))
qp <- solve.QP(Dmat, dvec, Amat, bvec, meq=1)

Example above has the following constraints ( example from here)

There are 4 constraints:

  • sum of weights equal to 1
  • portfolio expected return equals to 5.2%
  • each asset weight greater than 0
  • each asset weight smaller than .5

I am currently trying to refresh my matrix/vector math, I would really appreciate if someone could tell me how you add the individual constraints together in aMat and bvec and the basic algebra background for it. And as another question how a constraint for weights <0 (shorting) would look like.

thanks in advance

1条回答
够拽才男人
2楼-- · 2020-03-31 04:35

First step is to write down the mathematical model. That could look like:

enter image description here

The next part is to implement this in R's quadprog. That could look like:

enter image description here

  • Adding comments to the code may help to understand it later
  • Quadprog does not allow simple lower- and upper-bounds on the variables, so we need to convert these to >= inequalities.
  • Notice that Quadprog minimizes 0.5*x'Qx. That has the same result as minimizing x'Qx.
  • Shorting can be allowed by using other lower-bounds on x.
  • Your data makes the model infeasible. I loosened the upper-bound on allocations from 0.5 to 0.8.
查看更多
登录 后发表回答