I just tried out this simple program... nothing fancy..
double[] a = new double[100000];
double[] b = new double[100000];
List<double> a1 = new List<double>();
List<double> b1 = new List<double>();
for (Int64 i = 0; i < 100000; i++)
{
a[i] = i;
a1.Add(i);
}
Parallel.For(0, 100000, delegate(Int64 i)
{
b[i] = i;
b1.Add(i);
});
According to this code, 100000 numbers must be stored in a, b, a1, b1 each. But at times, the variable b1 (List updated by the Parallel Process) has less than 100000 numbers (Keeps varying between 90000 and 100000). I wonder why...
List<T>
is not thread-safe for multiple threads to be writing simultaneously, as described on the MSDN page. You must synchronize access (defeating the purpose of multiple threads) or use a thread-safe collection. There are thread-safe collections available in theSystem.Collections.Concurrent
namespace.