{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 Anthone 的问题《Why does Directory.GetFiles() run faster on subseq》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-1261999.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
I'm not really sure what causes this so please forgive me if I couldn't find the information I needed in a search. Here is an example:
Let's say that we have a folder with 1,000,000 files. Running Directory.GetFiles() on that will take a few minutes. However, running it again right after will take only a few seconds. Why does this happen? Are the objects being cached somewhere? How can I run it with the original time?
Hard drives have internal caches that will help speed up subsequent reads. Try reading a bunch of other directory information in a completely different sector to clear the cache.