StringBuilder for string concatenation throws OutO

Question

We mostly tend to following the above best practice.

Have a look at String vs StringBuilder

But StringBuilder could throw OutOfMemoryException even when there is sufficient memory available. It throws OOM exception because it needs "continuous block of memory".

Some links for reference StringBuilder OutOfMemoryException

and there are many more.....

How many of you faced this problem or aware and what did you do to resolve it?

Is there anything I am missing?

P.S: I wasn't aware of this.

I have rephrased the question.

*** The same thing worked with manual concatenation(I'll verify this and update SO). The other thing that caused me concern was that there is enough memory in the system. That's the reason I raised this question here to check whether any one faced this problem or there was something drastically wrong with the code.

Answer 1

The underyling string you create will also need a contiguous block of memory because it is represented as an array of chars (arrays require contiguous memory) . If the StringBuilder throws an OOM exception you woludn't be able to build the underlying without it.

If creating a string causes an OOM, there is likely a more serious issue in your application.

Edit in response to clarification:

There is a small subset of cases where building a string with a StringBuilder will fail when manual concatenation succeeds. Manual concatenation will use the exact length required in order to combine two strings while a StringBuilder has a different algorithmn for allocating memory. It's more aggressive and will likely allocate more memory than is actually needed for the string.

Using a StringBuilder will also result in a temporary doubling of the memory required since the string will be present in a System.String form and StringBuilder simultaneously for a short time.

But if one way is causing an OOM and the other is not, it still likely points to a more serious issue in your program.

Answer 2

If you are running soclose to your memory limits that this is even a concern, then you should probably think about a different architecture or get a beefier machine.