Caution : Although this question covers long textual information with a mess of Java code snippets, it is merely targeted to JavaScript/jQuery and a bit of PrimeFaces stuff (just <p:remoteCommand>
) as mentioned in the introductory part in the beginning.
I am receiving a JSON message from WebSockets (Java EE 7 / JSR 356 WebSocket API) as follows.
if (window.WebSocket) {
var ws = new WebSocket("wss://localhost:8181/ContextPath/AdminPush");
ws.onmessage = function (event) {
jsonMsg=event.data;
var json = JSON.parse(jsonMsg);
var msg=json["jsonMessage"];
if (window[msg]) {
window[msg](); //It is literally interpreted as a function - updateModel();
}
};
}
In the above code, event.data
contains a JSON string {"jsonMessage":"updateModel"}
. Thus, msg
will contain a string value which is updateModel
.
In the following segment of code,
if (window[msg]) {
window[msg](); //It is literally interpreted as a JavaScript function - updateModel();
}
window[msg]();
causes a JavaScript function associated with a <p:remoteCommand>
to be invoked (which in turn invokes an actionListener="#{bean.remoteAction}"
associated with the <p:remoteCommand>
).
<p:remoteCommand name="updateModel"
actionListener="#{bean.remoteAction}"
oncomplete="notifyAll()"
process="@this"
update="@none"/>
update="@none"
is not necessarily needed.
After receiving this message, I need to notify all the associated clients about this update. I use the following JavaScript function to do so which is associated with the oncomplete
handler of the above <p:remoteCommand>
.
var jsonMsg;
function notifyAll() {
if(jsonMsg) {
sendMessage(jsonMsg);
}
}
Notice that the variable jsonMsg
is already assigned a value in the first snippet - it is a global variable. sendMessage()
is another JavaScript function that actually sends a notification about this update to all the associated clients through WebSockets which is not needed in this question.
This works well but is there a way to do some magic in the following condition
if (window[msg]) {
window[msg]();
//Do something to call notifyAll() on oncomplete of remote command.
}
so that the notifyAll()
function can be invoked through some JavaScript code directly (which is currently attached to oncomplete
of <p:remoteCommand>
and the expected JavaScript code (or even something else) should simulate this oncomplete
) basically eliminating the need to depend upon a global JavaScript variable (jsonMSg
)?
Edit : The problem I am trying to solve (it may be considered to be additional information).
When an admin for example, makes some changes (by means of DML operations) to a JPA entity named Category
, entity listeners are triggered which in turn causes a CDI event to be raised as follows.
@ApplicationScoped
public class CategoryListener {
@PostPersist
@PostUpdate
@PostRemove
public void onChange(Category category) throws NamingException {
BeanManager beanManager = (BeanManager) InitialContext.doLookup("java:comp/BeanManager");
beanManager.fireEvent(new CategoryChangeEvent(category));
}
}
Needless to say that the entity Category
is designated with the annotation @EntityListeners(CategoryListener.class)
.
Just one side note (completely off topic) : Getting an instance of BeanManager
through a JNDI look-up as done in the preceding code snippet is temporary. The GlassFish Server 4.1 having the Weld version 2.2.2 final fails to inject the CDI event javax.enterprise.event.Event<T>
which is supposed to be injected as follows.
@Inject
private Event<CategoryChangeEvent> event;
And then, the event can be fired as follows with reference to the relevant code snippet above.
event.fire(new CategoryChangeEvent(category));
This event is observed in the web project as follows.
@ApplicationScoped
public class RealTimeUpdate {
public void onCategoryChange(@Observes CategoryChangeEvent event) {
AdminPush.sendAll("updateModel");
}
}
Where an admin uses his own end-point as follows (AdminPush.sendAll("updateModel");
is invoked manually therein).
@ServerEndpoint(value = "/AdminPush", configurator = ServletAwareConfig.class)
public final class AdminPush {
private static final Set<Session> sessions = new LinkedHashSet<Session>();
@OnOpen
public void onOpen(Session session, EndpointConfig config) {
if (Boolean.valueOf((String) config.getUserProperties().get("isAdmin"))) {
sessions.add(session);
}
}
@OnClose
public void onClose(Session session) {
sessions.remove(session);
}
private static JsonObject createJsonMessage(String message) {
return JsonProvider.provider().createObjectBuilder().add("jsonMessage", message).build();
}
public static void sendAll(String text) {
synchronized (sessions) {
String message = createJsonMessage(text).toString();
for (Session session : sessions) {
if (session.isOpen()) {
session.getAsyncRemote().sendText(message);
}
}
}
}
}
Here only an admin is allowed to use this end-point. All other users are prevented from creating a WebSocket session using a conditional check in the onOpen()
method.
session.getAsyncRemote().sendText(message);
inside the foreach
loop sends a notification (in the form of a JSON message) to the admin about these changes made in the entity Category
.
As shown in the first code snippet, window[msg]();
invokes an action method (through a <p:remoteCommand>
as shown earlier) associated with an application scoped bean - actionListener="#{realTimeMenuManagedBean.remoteAction}"
.
@Named
@ApplicationScoped
public class RealTimeMenuManagedBean {
@Inject
private ParentMenuBeanLocal service;
private List<Category> category;
private final Map<Long, List<SubCategory>> categoryMap = new LinkedHashMap<Long, List<SubCategory>>();
// Other lists and maps as and when required for a dynamic CSS menu.
public RealTimeMenuManagedBean() {}
@PostConstruct
private void init() {
populate();
}
private void populate() {
categoryMap.clear();
category = service.getCategoryList();
for (Category c : category) {
Long catId = c.getCatId();
categoryMap.put(catId, service.getSubCategoryList(catId));
}
}
// This method is invoked through the above-mentioned <p:remoteCommand>.
public void remoteAction() {
populate();
}
// Necessary accessor methods only.
}
All other users/clients (who are on a different panel - other than the admin panel) should only be notified when actionListener="#{realTimeMenuManagedBean.remoteAction}"
finishes in its entirely - must not happen before the action method finishes - should be notified through the oncomplate
event handler of <p:remoteCommand>
. This is the reason why two different end-points have been taken.
Those other users use their own end-point:
@ServerEndpoint("/Push")
public final class Push {
private static final Set<Session> sessions = new LinkedHashSet<Session>();
@OnOpen
public void onOpen(Session session) {
sessions.add(session);
}
@OnClose
public void onClose(Session session) {
sessions.remove(session);
}
@OnMessage
public void onMessage(String text) {
synchronized (sessions) {
for (Session session : sessions) {
if (session.isOpen()) {
session.getAsyncRemote().sendText(text);
}
}
}
}
}
The method annotated with @OnMessage
comes to play, when a message is sent through oncomplete
of <p:remoteCommand>
as shown above.
Those clients use the following JavaScript code to just fetch the new values from the above-mentioned application scoped bean (the bean was already queried adequately by the admin from the database. Thus, there is no need to ridiculously query it again by each and every individual client separately (other than the admin). Hence, it is an application scoped bean).
if (window.WebSocket) {
var ws = new WebSocket("wss://localhost:8181/ContextPath/Push");
ws.onmessage = function (event) {
var json = JSON.parse(event.data);
var msg = json["jsonMessage"];
if (window[msg]) {
window[msg]();
}
};
$(window).on('beforeunload', function () {
ws.close();
});
}
In conjunction with the following <p:remoteCommand>
.
<p:remoteCommand name="updateModel"
process="@this"
update="parentMenu"/>
Where parentMenu
- the component to be updated by this <p:remoteCommand>
is an id
of a container JSF component <h:panelGroup>
which contains a plain CSS menu with a bunch of <ui:repeat>
s.
Hope this makes the scenario clearer.
Update :
This question has been answered precisely here based on <p:remoteCommand>
(As to the concrete question, the sole question was to remove a dependency upon a global JavaScript variable as stated in the introductory part of this question).
I don't think I understood every aspect of your problem, but anyway I try to help a bit. Note that I do not know PrimeFaces, so all I did was reading the docs.
What I understand is, that you try to get rid of the global variable. But I am afraid, I do not think this is possible.
The problem here is, that PrimeFaces does not allow you to pass something transparently from your invocation of the remote call further to the
oncomplete
call (except you pass it to a Java code of the Bean and then back to the UI, and this usually is not what you want).However, I hope, you can come very close to it.
Part 1, JS returns early
Please also note that there probably is some misconception about Java and JavaScript.
Java is multithreaded and runs several commands in parallel, while JavaScript is singlethreaded and usually never waits for something to complete. Doing things asychronously is mandatory to get a responsive Web-UI.
Hence your
remoteCommand
invocation (seen from the JS side) will (usually, async case) return long before theoncomplete
handler will be invoked. That means, ifwindow[msg]()
returns, you are not finished with theremoteCommand
yet.So what you want to manage with following code
will fail.
dosomethinghere()
will not be invoked when theremoteCommand
returned (as JS does not want to wait for some event, which might never happen). This means,dosomethinghere()
will be invoked when the Ajax-request was just opened to the remote (to the Java application).To run something after the Ajax call finished, this must be done in the
oncomplete
routine (oronsuccess
). This is why it's there.Part 2, validate
msg
Please note something different about
window[msg]()
. This can be considered a bit dangerous if you cannot trust the pushed message completely.window[msg]()
essentially runs any function named with the contents of the variablemsg
. For example ifmsg
happen to beclose
thenwindow.close()
will be run, which probably is not what you want.You should make sure,
msg
is one expected word, and decline all other words. Example code for this:Part 3: How to handle multiple JSON messages in parallel
The global variable has some drawback. There is only one. If you happen to receive another JSON message on the WebSocket while the previous message still is processing in the
remoteCommand
, this will overwrite the previous message. So thenotifyAll()
will see the newer message twice, the old one is lost.A classical race condition. What you must do is, to create something like a registry to register all the messages, and then pass some value to
notifyAll()
to tell, which of the registered messages shall be processed.With only a little change, you can either parallely (here) or serially (Part 4) process the messages.
First, create a counter to be able to distinguish the messages. Also an object to store all the messages. And we declare all valid messages we expect (see Part 2):
Now add a message each time we receive one:
To be able to pass the
nr
toNotifyAll()
an additional parameter needs to be passed to the Bean. Let's call itmsgNr
:Perhaps have a look into https://stackoverflow.com/a/7221579/490291 for more on passing values this way.
The
remoteAction
bean now gets an additional parametermsgNr
passed, which must be passed back via Ajax.Hence the function looks a bit like (bear with me, please):
If you split this into two functions, then you can invoke the
notifyAll()
from other parts in your application:Part 4: serialize requests
Now to the changes to serialize things. That's quite easy by adding some semaphore. Semaphores in JavaScript are just variables. This is because there is only one global thread.
Note:
jsonMsgNrLast
could be just a flag (true/false). However having the current processed number in a variable perhaps can help somewhere else.Having said that, there is a starvation problem in case something fails in
sendMessage
ordosomething
. So perhaps you can interleave it a bit:This way the AJAX request is already send out while
sendMessage
is running. If nowdosomething
has a JavaScript error or similar, the messages are still processed correctly.Part 5: Direct Invocation from JS
Now, with all this in place and a serialized Run, you can always invoke the previous
notifyAll()
usingrealNotifyAll(jsonMsgNrLast)
. Or you can display thejsonMessages
in a list and choose any arbitrary number.By skipping the call to
window[jsonMessages[nr].json.msg]([{name:'msgNr', value:nr}]);
(and abovewindow[msg]([{name:'msgNr', value:nr}]);
) you also can halt the Bean processing and run it on-demand using the usual JQuery callbacks. For this create a function and change the code a bit again:Now you can start the processing with
runRemote(nr)
and invoke the completion function withrealNotifyAll(nr)
.The function
updateGuiPushList(nr, state)
withstate=0:finished 1=added 2=running
is the callback to your GUI code which updates the on-screen list of waiting pushes to process. SetautoRun=false
to stop automatic processing andautoRun=true
for automatic processing.Note: After setting
autoRun
fromfalse
totrue
you need to triggerrunRemote
once with the lowestnr
, of course.