I've got a situation where I have two different webapps running on a single server, using different ports. They're both running Java's Jetty servlet container, so they both use a cookie parameter named JSESSIONID to track the session id. These two webapps are fighting over the session id.
- Open a Firefox tab, and go to WebApp1
- WebApp1's HTTP response has a set-cookie header with JSESSIONID=1
- Firefox now has a Cookie header with JSESSIONID=1 in all it's HTTP requests to WebApp1
- Open a second Firefox tab, and go to WebApp2
- The HTTP reqeust to WebApp2 also has a Cookie header with JSESSIONID=1, but in the doGet, when I call
req.getSession(false);
I getnull
. And if I callreq.getSession(true)
I get a new Session object, but then the HTTP response from WebApp2 has a set-cookie header with JSESSIONID=20 - Now, WebApp2 has a working Session, but WebApp1's session is gone. Going to WebApp1 will give me a new session, blowing away WebApp2's session.
- Continue forever
So the Sessions are thrashing between each web app. I'd really like for the req.getSession(false)
to return a valid session if there's already a JSESSIONID cookie defined.
One option is to basically reimplement the Session framework with a HashMap and cookies called WEBAPP1SESSIONID and WEBAPP2SESSIONID, but that sucks, and means I'll have to hack the new Session stuff into ActionServlet and a few other places.
This must be a problem others have encountered. Is Jetty's HttpServletRequest.getSession(boolean)
just crappy?
It is correct behavior. You can place two your webapps to different domains, or by different paths.
It's not Jetty's problem, it's how the cookie specification was defined. Beside the name/value pair, a cookie may also contain an expiration date, a path, a domain name, and whether the cookie is secure (i.e. intended only for SSL connections). The port number is not listed in the above ;-) so you'll need to vary either the path or the domain, as stepancheg says in his answer.
I've been digging, and I found that in
AbstractSessionManager
, there's a method calledgetCrossContextSessionIDs()
. If it returnstrue
, then when creating a new session, Jetty will first check if JSESSIONID is set, and try to use that existing session id. I think I can set the values totrue
using some kind of java property on startup.On further digging, this will only help me if I'm running two webapps in different contexts of the same Jetty (hence, cross-context). When creating a new
Session
object, a newJSESSIONID
value is chosen. IfgetCrossContextSessionIDs()
returnstrue
, then it'll check if the currentJSESSIONID
value was created by this Jetty (including all other contexts) and if it was, it'll reuse it.Since I'm dealing with two different Jetty instances running on two different ports, I'll need to hack Jetty's source to not do that check, or just make my own session-like framework.
You could also set the jsessionid cookie path, I believe.
In our case we are using Tomcat, so the solution is to use different session cookie names on each instance.
In
context.xml
do something likeI had a similar problem: One or more instances of the same application on localhost on different ports, choosen at application start time, each using its own jetty instance.
After a while, I came up with this:
socketManager.getLocalPort()
)(sessionHandler.getSessionManager().setSessionCookie(String)
)This way I have a difference cookie name for each instance - thus no interference anymore.