I've made a grid template with rows of 1fr 1fr 1fr. In the middle row, there are a list of inline images.
In Chrome and Firefox, the images respect the height of the grid row and adapt properly. However, in Safari 10.1.2 and Safari TP 31, there appears to be a combination of the images overflowing the row and not scaling the image widths appropriately.
Perhaps I'm doing something wrong? Or is this a Safari bug? And if so, is there a workaround?
Safari 10.1
Safari TP
Chrome 60
#grid {
height: 100vh;
display: grid;
grid-template-rows: 1fr 1fr 1fr;
}
#thumbnailContainer {
position: inherit;
overflow-x: auto;
overflow-y: hidden;
white-space: nowrap;
}
img {
display: inline;
height: 100%;
width: auto;
}
header,
footer {
background-color: dodgerblue;
}
<div id="grid">
<header>Header</header>
<div id="thumbnailContainer">
<img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7591/16903911106_b7ced9d758.jpg">
<img src="https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8740/16927517701_810fcb2a7c.jpg">
<img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7637/16902583636_15138a68f0.jpg">
<img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/8/7614/16927530091_6755845b13.jpg">
<img src="https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8700/16741099010_d0ecd9df1f.jpg">
<img src="https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8745/16927567841_74fd20d01d.jpg">
</div>
<footer>Footer</footer>
</div>
Short Answer
The problem is that Safari is not recognizing the
height: 100%
on theimg
elements.Explanation
This is not a Safari bug. It's just a different interpretation of the spec.
When dealing with percentage heights, some browsers (like Safari) adhere to the traditional interpretation of the spec, which requires a defined height on the parent.
In other words, a percentage height on an in-flow element will be recognized only when the parent has a defined height.
Some browsers, such as Chrome and Firefox, have moved past this interpretation and now accept flex and grid heights as an adequate parent reference for a child with a percentage height.
But Safari is stuck in the past. This doesn't mean it's wrong, invalid or a bug.
The last substantive update to the CSS
height
definition was in 1998 (CSS2). With so many new CSS properties and technologies since that time, the definition has become obsolete, unclear and woefully incomplete. Until the definition is updated for modern use, browser rendering variations can be expected.Solution
Since Safari doesn't recognize the
height: 100%
on theimg
elements, and you can't specify a height on the parent (#thumbnailContainer
) because that height is defined bygrid-template-rows: 1fr
on the top-level container, you can try using flexbox.By making
#thumbnailContainer
a flex container, you can define the size of the images (flex items) using flex properties.jsFiddle
More information
height
property and percentage values