Any async function is already going to return a Promise, and must be dealt with as a Promise (either directly as a Promise, or by also await-ing.
If you await inside of the function, it's redundant because the function outside will also await it in some way, so there is no reason to not just send the Promise along and let the outer thing deal with it.
It's not syntactically wrong or incorrect and it generally won't cause issues. It's just entirely redundant which is why the linter triggers on it.
Using return await does have some newly introduced benefits in v8 engine used by Node.js, Chrome and a few other browsers:
v8 introduced a --async-stack-traces flag which as of V8 v7.3 is enabled by default (Node.js v12.0.0).
This flags provides an improved developer experience by enriching the Error stack property with async function calls stack trace.
async function foo() {
return bar();
}
async function bar() {
await Promise.resolve();
throw new Error('BEEP BEEP');
}
foo().catch(error => console.log(error.stack));
Error: BEEP BEEP
at bar (<anonymous>:7:9)
Note that by calling return bar();foo() function call does not appear at all in the error stack. Changing it to return await bar(); gives a much better error stack output:
async function foo() {
return await bar();
}
Error: BEEP BEEP
at bar (<anonymous>:7:9)
at async foo (<anonymous>:2:10)
This indeed does provide much better error stack tracing, hence it is HIGHLY encouraged to always await your promises.
Additionally, async/wait now outperformes hand written promises:
async/await outperforms hand-written promise code now. The key takeaway here is that we significantly reduced the overhead of async functions — not just in V8, but across all JavaScript engines, by patching the spec. Source
Basically, because
return await
is redundant.Look at it from a slightly higher level of how you actually use an
async
function:Any
async
function is already going to return aPromise
, and must be dealt with as aPromise
(either directly as aPromise
, or by alsoawait
-ing.If you
await
inside of the function, it's redundant because the function outside will alsoawait
it in some way, so there is no reason to not just send thePromise
along and let the outer thing deal with it.It's not syntactically wrong or incorrect and it generally won't cause issues. It's just entirely redundant which is why the linter triggers on it.
Using
return await
does have some newly introduced benefits in v8 engine used by Node.js, Chrome and a few other browsers:v8 introduced a
--async-stack-traces
flag which as of V8 v7.3 is enabled by default (Node.js v12.0.0).This flags provides an improved developer experience by enriching the Error stack property with async function calls stack trace.
Note that by calling
return bar();
foo()
function call does not appear at all in the error stack. Changing it toreturn await bar();
gives a much better error stack output:This indeed does provide much better error stack tracing, hence it is HIGHLY encouraged to always await your promises.
Additionally, async/wait now outperformes hand written promises:
Read more about these changes on the v8.dev blog: https://v8.dev/blog/fast-async#improved-developer-experience
Because you can just
The returned result of
async function
always isPromise
, no matter you return the exact value or anotherPromise
object inside the function body