How do you write first responder unit tests?
I'm trying to write a test to confirm that a method advances focus to the next text field. controller
is a descendant of UIViewController
. But this exploratory test fails:
- (void)testFirstResponder
{
[controller view];
[[controller firstTextField] becomeFirstResponder];
STAssertTrue([[controller firstTextField] isFirstResponder], nil);
}
The first line causes the view to be loaded so that its outlets are in place. The text fields are non-nil. But the test never passes.
I'm guessing that becomeFirstResponder
doesn't set the first responder right away, but schedules it for later. So is there a good way to write a unit test against it?
Pulling up answer from comment in accepted answer… Let things run for a short time:
[[NSRunLoop currentRunLoop] runUntilDate:[NSDate date]];
I've also found I need to create a UIWindow and drop the view controller's view into it, as stated in the most-upvoted answer.
You need to ensure the textField is installed in the view hierarchy.
If the view’s window property holds a UIWindow object, it has been installed in a view hierarchy; if it returns nil, the view is detached from any hierarchy.
Hopefully this helps....
Using Xcode 5.1 and
XCTestCase
, this seems to work okay:In order for a view/subview to become first responder, it must be part of a view hierarchy, meaning that its root view's window property must be set.
Jon and Sergio mention that you may need to call
[[NSRunLoop currentRunLoop] runUntilDate:[NSDate date]]
after callingbecomeFirstResponder
on your desired subview, but I found that this wasn't required in our instance.However, your mileage may vary (even depending on the version of Xcode you're using), so you may or may not need to include such call.
I guess that managing/changing the first responder chain is somehow accomplished in the main loop, when the UI is updated preparing for the next event handling. If this hypothesis is correct, I would simply do the following:
Note: I have used a 0.0 delay because I simply want that the message is put on the event queue and dispatched as soon as possible. I need just a way to get back to the main loop, for its housekeeping. This should produce no actual delay in your case. If you are executing several tests of the same kind, i.e. by repeatedly changing the control that is the first responder, this technique should guarantee that all of those events correctly ordered with the ones generated by
performSelector
.If you are running your tests from a different thread, you could use
– performSelectorOnMainThread:withObject:waitUntilDone: