So, I have a MEX gateway script file that calls my C source code. I've used the -L and -I commands to link my 64-bit compiled GSL libraries (.libs) to my mex executable, which is then compiled under the extension of .mexw64.
I want for this executable to be transferred to another windows machine and run fine, without any GSL libraries installed. That is the the only solution, I don't care what he arguments are regarding the benefits of the dynamic linking/code generation upon compile-time are. I want an executable that has every function not only (of course) pre-declared, but also PRE-DEFINED.
I was lead to believe that this is what 'static' linking is vs. dynamic; but I've read some contradictory definitions all around the interwebs. I need a completely 100% standalone, singular file.
Supposedly you can link the actual .obj file in the mex function, which I can generate, but unfortunately I then get unresolved symbol errors.
Someone else mentioned that I can use the -l (lowercase L) to directly link the actual .lib(s) needed, statically, but that is NOT true.
So is there anyone that can lead me in the right direction, either how to have everything not only linked but to also have the DEFINITIONS linked and ready to load when executable is run--completely standalone, or why I am running into unresolved symbols/linker errors when I include my .obj file? Am I misunderstanding something elementary about the linking process?
Also: To elaborate a bit more, I have the GSL libraries built and linked via Visual Studio for the 64 bit architecture, and I can link it easily with MATLAB, so that is not my problem (any more).
EDIT: I've seen the post here: Generating standalone MEX file with GNU compilers, including libraries
This doesn't solve my problem, however, although it is the same question. I don't have access to gcc; it's finally compiling on the MSVS12 compiler in MATLAB, I'm not going try to recompile using GCC via MinGW (already tried, couldn't figure it out), so -static and .a options are out.
In your previous post, you mentioned that you decided to compile GSL library with Visual C++, using the VS solution provided by Brian Gladman.
Here is a step-by-step illustration on how to build a MEX-function that links against GSL libraries statically:
C:\gsl-1.16
C:\gsl-1.16\build.vc11
.C:\gsl-1.16\build.vc11\gsl.lib.sln
platform=x64
andmode=Release
gslhdrs
project firstcblas.lib
andgsl.lib
stored inC:\gsl-1.16\lib\x64\Release
(along with corresponding PDB debugging symbols). It will also create a directory containing the final header files:C:\gsl-1.16\gsl
Next we proceed to build a MEX-function. Take the following simple program (computes some value from a Bessel function, and return it as output):
gsl_test.c
This is how to compile the above C code in MATLAB:
Finally we test the MEX-file, and compare it against the value reported by MATLAB's own Bessel function:
Note that the built MEX-function has no external DLL dependencies (other than "Visual C Runtime" which is expected, and the usual MATLAB libraries). You can verify that by using Dependency Walker if you want. So you can simply deploy the
gsl_test.mexw64
file alone (assuming the users already have the corresponding VC++ runtime installed on their machines).