Pandas to_sql doesn't insert any data in my ta

2020-02-13 10:05发布

I am trying to insert some data in a table I have created. I have a data frame that looks like this:

dataframe

I created a table:

create table online.ds_attribution_probabilities
(
attribution_type text,
channel text,
date date ,
value float
)

And I am running this python script:

engine = create_engine("postgresql://@e.eu-central-1.redshift.amazonaws.com:5439/mdhclient_encoding=utf8")
connection = engine.raw_connection()
result.to_sql('online.ds_attribution_probabilities', con=engine, index = False, if_exists = 'append')

I get no error, but when I check there are no data in my table. What can be wrong? Do I have to commit or do an extra step?

7条回答
相关推荐>>
2楼-- · 2020-02-13 10:06

This could happen because it defaults to the public database, and there's probably a table with that name under the public database/schema, with your data in it.

@MaxU's answer does help some, but not the others. For others, here is something else you can try:

When you create the engine, specify the schemaname like this:

engine = create_engine(*<connection_string>*,
    connect_args={'options': '-csearch_path={}'.format(*<dbschema_name>*)})

Link: https://stackoverflow.com/a/49930672/8656608

查看更多
Bombasti
3楼-- · 2020-02-13 10:07

I have a similar situation. Not able to insert pandas dataframe into oracle table. I am using cx_oracle and SQLalchemy for oracle connection. There is no error. I am using following command:

pd_df.to_sql('abc.xyz', conn, schema = 'abc', if_exists='replace', index='false')
查看更多
【Aperson】
4楼-- · 2020-02-13 10:19

Hopefully this helps someone else. to_sql will fail silently in the form of what looks like a successful insert if you pass a connection object. This is definitely true for Postgres, but i assume the same for others as well, based on the method docs:

con : sqlalchemy.engine.Engine or sqlite3.Connection
    Using SQLAlchemy makes it possible to use any DB supported by that
    library. Legacy support is provided for sqlite3.Connection objects.

This got me because the typing hints stated Union[Engine, Connection], which is "technically" true.

If you have a session with SQLAlchemy try passing con=session.get_bind(),

查看更多
我想做一个坏孩纸
5楼-- · 2020-02-13 10:19

Check the autocommit setting: https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/core/connections.html#understanding-autocommit

engine.execute(text("SELECT my_mutating_procedure()").execution_options(autocommit=True))
查看更多
家丑人穷心不美
6楼-- · 2020-02-13 10:23

I faced the same problem when I used .connect() and .begin()

with engine.connect() as conn, conn.begin():
         dataframe.to_sql(name='table_name', schema='schema',
         con=conn, if_exists='append', index=False)
         conn.close()

Just remove the .connect() and .begin() and it will work.

查看更多
劫难
7楼-- · 2020-02-13 10:27

I had a similar issue caused by the fact that I was passing sqlalchemy connection object instead of engine object to the con parameter. In my case tables were created but left empty.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答