How to use String property as primary key in Entit

2019-01-14 16:08发布

I'm new in EF and try to do my first steps by code first approach in ETF6.0 and now i have a problem.

I have a property

[Key]
public string FooId { get; set; }

which is my primary key for the model.

But if I run the

PM> Update-Database

command in package manager console to update pending migrations to the database i get the following error:

Identity column 'FooId' must be of data type int, bigint, smallint, tinyint, or decimal or numeric with a scale of 0, and constrained to be nonnullable.

If I change the PK in my model to

[Key]
public int FooId { get; set; } 

everything works fine.

But I would need the PK to be of type string because it makes absolutely sens in my case. I know there are disadvantages but for me it is necessary.

I saw an older post here How to make string as primary key in entity framework!.

But it seems not to solve my problem or I just don't understand it.

Is it really that I can't use a string as PK on a SQL database?

Or is there a way to do that?

3条回答
干净又极端
2楼-- · 2019-01-14 16:43

If you need your primary key to be a string, then don't make it an identity column. Identity columns will generate primary key values for you, which you should turn off if you intend to generate the values yourself.

查看更多
Ridiculous、
3楼-- · 2019-01-14 16:46

This is the proper way of creating a PK without Identity Autoincrement enabled:

[Key]
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.None)]
public string FooId { get; set; }
查看更多
一纸荒年 Trace。
4楼-- · 2019-01-14 16:48

What is your reason for having a string as a primary key?

I would just set the primary key to an auto incrementing integer field, and put an index on the string field.

That way if you do searches on the table they should be relatively fast, and all of your joins and normal look ups will be unaffected in their speed.

You can also control the amount of the string field that gets indexed. In other words, you can say "only index the first 5 characters" if you think that will be enough. Or if your data can be relatively similar, you can index the whole field.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答