I'd like to have a compareTo method that takes a Real (a class for working with arbitrarily large and precise real numbers [well, as long as it's less than 2^31 in length at the moment]) and a compareTo method that takes an Object, but Java isn't letting me and I'm not experienced enough to know why.
I just tried to modify the class to implement Comparable and I got these error messages below. I don't really understand what the error messages mean but I know it's got something to do with the horrible way I'm trying to give the class some flexibility with all the different method signatures for every single method I make, and I can fix it by removing the compareTo(Object other) method, but I would ideally like to keep it. So what I'm really asking is: Is there a way to make these error messages disappear without removing the compareTo(Object other) method and what exactly do these errors mean?
Also, I know there are already some built-in Java classes like BigInteger and things like that for what I'm trying to use this class for but I'm doing it for fun/satisfaction for use with Project Euler (https://projecteuler.net/).
Jake@Jake-PC /cygdrive/c/Users/Jake/Documents/Java/Mathematics
$ javac Real.java
Real.java:377: error: name clash: compareTo(Real) in Real overrides a method whose erasure is the same as another method, yet neither overrides the other
public int compareTo(Real other)
^
first method: compareTo(Object) in Real
second method: compareTo(T) in Comparable
where T is a type-variable:
T extends Object declared in interface Comparable
Real.java:440: error: name clash: compareTo(Object) in Real and compareTo(T) in Comparable have the same erasure, yet neither overrides the other
public int compareTo(Object other)
^
where T is a type-variable:
T extends Object declared in interface Comparable
2 errors
These are the compareTo methods:
@Override
public int compareTo(Real other)
{
// Logic.
}
public int compareTo(char givenValue)
{ return compareTo(new Real(givenValue)); }
public int compareTo(char[] givenValue)
{ return compareTo(new Real(givenValue)); }
public int compareTo(char[] givenValue, int offset, int count)
{ return compareTo(new Real(givenValue, offset, count)); }
public int compareTo(double givenValue)
{ return compareTo(new Real(givenValue)); }
public int compareTo(float givenValue)
{ return compareTo(new Real(givenValue)); }
public int compareTo(int givenValue)
{ return compareTo(new Real(givenValue)); }
public int compareTo(long givenValue)
{ return compareTo(new Real(givenValue)); }
public int compareTo(Object other)
{ return compareTo(new Real(other.toString())); }
and the constructors just in case you need them:
public Real(String givenValue)
{
// Logic.
}
public Real(char givenValue)
{ this(String.valueOf(givenValue)); }
public Real(char[] givenValue)
{ this(String.valueOf(givenValue)); }
public Real(char[] givenValue, int offset, int count)
{ this(String.valueOf(givenValue, offset, count)); }
public Real(double givenValue)
{ this(String.valueOf(givenValue)); }
public Real(float givenValue)
{ this(String.valueOf(givenValue)); }
public Real(int givenValue)
{ this(String.valueOf(givenValue)); }
public Real(long givenValue)
{ this(String.valueOf(givenValue)); }
public Real(Object other)
{ this(other.toString()); }
Since you want to be able to compare
Real
object toObject
, you may just replace theimplements Comparable<Real>
withimplements Comparable<Object>
. This would be consistent withComparable<T>
javadoc which says that<T> the type of objects that this object may be compared to
.Then you just have to change your current code to :
The offending methods are:
These methods have the same erasure, meaning that once the compiler strips out generic type information, there will no longer be a way to differentiate them at runtime.
Your options are to either remove the
compareTo(Object other)
overload, or forReal
to implementComparable<Object>
.Since it looks like the implementations of all your
compareTo
overloads just instantiate a newReal
and pass it tocompareTo(Real)
, I'd suggest removing them and leaving that conversion up to the caller:This is a side effect of Java generics type-erasure.
You are implementing a generic interface, Comparable, but this its unique method, once generic type erased will become compareTo(Object), hence it clashes with your own compareTo(Object).
Here is a minimal code to reproduce: