I have a webpage that rapidly streams JSON from the server and displays bits of it, about 10 times/second. One part is a base64-encoded PNG image. I've found a few different ways to display the image, but all of them cause unbounded memory usage. It rises from 50mb to 2gb within minutes. Happens with Chrome, Safari, and Firefox. Haven't tried IE.
I discovered the memory usage first by looking at Activity Monitor.app -- the Google Chrome Renderer process continuously eats memory. Then, I looked at Chrome's Resource inspector (View
> Developer
> Developer Tools
, Resources
), and I saw that it was caching the images. Every time I changed the img src
, or created a new Image() and set its src
, Chrome cached it. I can only imagine the other browsers are doing the same.
Is there any way to control this caching? Can I turn it off, or do something sneaky so it never happens?
Edit: I'd like to be able to use the technique in Safari/Mobile Safari. Also, I'm open to other methods of rapidly refreshing an image if anyone has any ideas.
Here are the methods I've tried. Each one resides in a function that gets called on AJAX completion.
Method 1 - Directly set the src
attribute on an img
tag
Fast. Displays nicely. Leaks like crazy.
$('#placeholder_img').attr('src', 'data:image/png;base64,' + imgString);
Method 2 - Replace img
with a canvas
, and use drawImage
Displays fine, but still leaks.
var canvas = document.getElementById("placeholder_canvas");
var ctx = canvas.getContext("2d");
var img = new Image();
img.onload = function() {
ctx.drawImage(img, 0, 0);
}
img.src = "data:image/png;base64," + imgString;
Method 3 - Convert to binary and replace canvas
contents
I'm doing something wrong here -- the images display small and look like random noise. This method uses a controlled amount of memory (grows to 100mb and stops), but it is slow, especially in Safari (~50% CPU usage there, 17% in Chrome). The idea came from this similar SO question: Data URI leak in Safari (was: Memory Leak with HTML5 canvas)
var img = atob(imgString);
var binimg = [];
for(var i = 0; i < img.length; i++) {
binimg.push(img.charCodeAt(i));
}
var bytearray = new Uint8Array(binimg);
// Grab the existing image from canvas
var ctx = document.getElementById("placeholder_canvas").getContext("2d");
var width = ctx.canvas.width,
height = ctx.canvas.height;
var imgdata = ctx.getImageData(0, 0, width, height);
// Overwrite it with new data
for(var i = 8, len = imgdata.data.length; i < len; i++) {
imgdata.data[i-8] = bytearray[i];
}
// Write it back
ctx.putImageData(imgdata, 0, 0);
I don't think there are any guarantees given about the memory usage of data URLs. If you can figure out a way to get them to behave in one browser, it guarantees little if not nothing about other browsers or versions.
If you put your image data into a blob and then create a blob URL, you can then deallocate that data.
Here's an example which turns a data URI into a blob URL; you may need to change / drop the
webkit-
&WebKit-
prefixes on browsers other than Chrome and possibly future versions of Chrome.Deallocating is as easy as :
And you can use your blob URL as your
img
'ssrc
.Unfortunately, blob URLs do not appear to be supported in IE prior to v10.
API reference:
http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/#dfn-createObjectURL
http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/#dfn-revokeObjectURL
Compatibility reference:
http://caniuse.com/#search=blob%20url
I know it's been years since this issue was posted, but the problem still exists in recent versions of Safari Browser. So I have a definitive solution that works in all browsers, and I think this could save jobs or lives!.
Copy the following code somewhere in your html page:
Then when you receive a new frame/image
base64Image
in base64 format (e.g.data:image/jpeg;base64, LzlqLzRBQ...
) and you want to update a html<img />
objectimageElement
, then use this code:Repeat this last code as much as needed and no memory leaks will appear. This solution doesn't require the use of the canvas element, but you can adapt the code to make it work.
Worked for me on memory leak thanks dude.
Try setting image.src = "" after drawing.
This might be helped
patching up ellisbben's answer, since BlobBuilder is obsoleted and https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/Code_snippets/StringView provides what appears to be a nice quick conversion from base64 to UInt8Array:
in html:
in js:
I still don't see it actually updating the image in Safari mobile, but chrome can receive dataurls rapid-fire over websocket and keep up with them far better than having to manually iterate over the string. And if you know you'll always have the same type of dataurl, you could even swap the regex out for a substring (likely quicker...?)
Running some quick memory profiles, it looks like Chrome is even able to keep up with deallocations (if you remember to do them...):
Unless Safari or Mobile Safari don't leak data urls, server-side might be the only way to do this on all browsers.
Probably most straightforward would be to make a URL for your image stream,
GET
ting it gives a 302 or 303 response redirecting to a single-use URL that will give the desired image. You will probably have to destroy and re-create the image tags to force a reload of the URL.You will also be at the mercy of the browser regarding its
img
caching behavior. And the mercy of my understanding (or lack of understanding) of the HTTP spec. Still, unless server-side operation doesn't fit your requirements, try this first. It adds to the complexity of the server, but this approach uses the browser much more naturally.But what about using the browser un-naturally? Depending on how browsers implement
iframe
s and handle their associated content, you might be able to get data urls working without leaking the memory. This is kinda Frankenstein shit and is exactly the sort of nonsense that no one should have to do. Upside: it could work. Downside: there are a bazillion ways to try it and uneven, undocumented behavior is exactly what I'd expect.One idea: embed an
iframe
containing a page; this page and the page that it is embedded in use cross document messaging (note the GREEN in the compatibility matrix!); embeddee gets the PNG string and passes it along to the embedded page, which then makes an appropriateimg
tag. When the embeddee needs to display a new message, it destroys the embeddediframe
(hopefully releasing the memory of the data url) then creates a new one and passes it the new PNG string.If you want to be marginally more clever, you could actually embed the source for the embedded frame in the embeddee page as a data url; however, this might leak that data url, which I guess would be poetic justice for trying such a reacharound.
"Something that works in Safari would be better." Browser technology keeps on moving forward, unevenly. When they don't hand the functionality to you on a plate, you gotta get devious.