I'm working on a game with SDL in Visual Studio 2010. I came across the _CrtDumpMemoryLeaks()
macro and thought I'd give it a go. Invoking _CrtDumpMemoryLeaks()
does print memory leaks to the output window, but it does not show where it happens.
I've read the MSDN article at Memory Leak Detection Enabling , and it explains that if I define _CRTDBG_MAP_ALLOC
it should output the line number of the offending statement. This does not happen in my case. (I was however able to get it to work if I use malloc() directly -- not by using 'new').
The code:
#define _CRTDBG_MAP_ALLOC
#include <crtdbg.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int *var = new int(5);
_CrtDumpMemoryLeaks();
return 0;
}
The output is the following:
Detected memory leaks!
Dumping objects ->
{58} normal block at 0x007D1510, 4 bytes long.
Data: < > 05 00 00 00
Object dump complete.
If _CrtDumpMemoryLeaks()
is unable to output line numbers when allocating using 'new' then suggestions for other ways to achieve similar behavior is appreciated.
The accepted answer by Charles Bailey requires that you change your source code and this is not necessary. If you are using
new
anddelete
(or the array versions), all you need to do is place this code snippet in thestdafx.h
file of each of your projects (including any static or dynamic library dependencies), and it will then give a source file and line number attached to each leaked memory object:This comes straight from Microsoft's webpage on the matter.
That's an old version of Visual Leak Detector.
Try this: http://vld.codeplex.com/
You might need these defines after your includes
Check out the piece of code.
Overloading operator new and operator delete to log all memory allocations and deallocations
I identified my memory leaks using this method.
When you define _DEBUG and include
<crtdbg.h>
you get an overloadedoperator new
which takes additional parameters which you can use to specify the file and line numbers in placementnew
expressions.E.g.
You can wrap this in a conditionally defined macro, e.g.
While you do see people defining a macro
new
to completely hide this form client code, I do not personally recommend it as it breaks anything already intentionally using placement new and you have to make sure that any headers using placement new (such as many standard headers) are included before any header redefiningnew
. This can make it easy to let some inline uses ofnew
in header files slip through without being 'adjusted'.