{var%20f='http://v.t.sina.com.cn/share/share.php?appkey=1515056452',u=z||d.location,p=['&url=',e(u),'&title=',e(t||d.title),'&source=',e(r),'&sourceUrl=',e(l),'&content=',c||'gb2312','&pic=',e(p||'')].join('');function%20a(){if(!window.open([f,p].join(''),'mb',['toolbar=0,status=0,resizable=1,width=440,height=430,left=',(s.width-440)/2,',top=',(s.height-430)/2].join('')))u.href=[f,p].join('');};if(/Firefox/.test(navigator.userAgent))setTimeout(a,0);else%20a();})(screen,document,encodeURIComponent,'','','https://www.manongdao.com/data/attach/logo/logo.png', '推荐 成全新的幸福 的问题《Oracle date compare broken because of DST》','https://www.manongdao.com/q-1184871.html','页面编码gb2312|utf-8默认gb2312'));){kind=link}
We've been debugging an issue with a SQL query executed from an app server running Java via Hibernate. The error:
[3/10/14 10:52:07:143 EDT] 0000a984 JDBCException W org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter logExceptions SQL Error: 1878, SQLState: 22008
[3/10/14 10:52:07:144 EDT] 0000a984 JDBCException E org.hibernate.util.JDBCExceptionReporter logExceptions ORA-01878: specified field not found in datetime or interval
We've been able to narrow this down to the simple SQL below.
select *
from MY_TABLE T
where T.MY_TIMESTAMP >= (CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - interval '1' hour );
When we run this in the same database, we get the error:
ORA-01878: specified field not found in datetime or interval
01878. 00000 - "specified field not found in datetime or interval"
*Cause: The specified field was not found in the datetime or interval.
*Action: Make sure that the specified field is in the datetime or interval.
The MY_TIMESTAMP column is defined as TIMESTAMP(6).
FWIW, if we change the comparison in the SQL above from >= to <=, the query works.
We assume this has something to do with the time change (we're in America/New_York) but we're having problems trying to figure out where to go from here with our debugging.
Also, we've seen this problem with a similar query that's running through MyBatis and the error looks like:
### Error querying database. Cause: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01878: specified field not found in datetime or interval
### The error may involve defaultParameterMap
### The error occurred while setting parameters
### Cause: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01878: specified field not found in datetime or interval
UPDATE: A teammate on Windows changed her Windows Date and Time settings by un-checking "Automatically adjust clock for Daylight Saving Time" and then opened a new SQLDeveloper instance. The second instance is able to run the query without any issue but the first (with the old DST setting) still fails.
Thanks to kordirko for the extremely detailed write up. I think in the future, we will be looking at different ways to compare dates that aren't as prone to error. In the meantime, we were able to figure out the problem and both a temporary and long-term solution.
First, more details on the issue. It turns out that the values being stored in the TIMESTAMP field in the database were incorrect. We saw this by using the dump function and examining the bytes. If you look at the 5th byte in the output below, you'll see the hour (this is actually the hour + 1 so 5 is actually 4AM). For the values between 3AM and 4AM, you'll notice that the 5th byte is 3 which represents 2AM. 2 AM March 9, 2014 in EST doesn't exist - this is an incorrect time according to DST rules and Oracle's rules.
After much research and discussion, we zeroed in on the fact that our version of the Oracle JDBC driver (11.2.0.2) might've been inserting the bad values. Oracle's information page on 11.2.0.3 references a bug that looks like it's our issue: "9785135 DST conversion not correct using jdbc 11g timestamtz". We wrote a quick test class that inserts values from March 9, 2014 1:50 AM to 4:00 AM using both the 11.2.0.2 and 11.2.0.3 driver. Here's a snippet of what was inserted into the db:
You'll notice that the 5th byte of the timestamp on the second row for 3:00 AM is incorrect (3). This was inserted using the 11.2.0.2 version. The same value inserted with the 11.2.0.3 version can be found on the fourth line with the correct 5th byte (4).
The long term fix here is to update our JDBC driver. The short term fix here was to find the rows that have the bad values and run an update statement on them from SQL Plus to set the time again (using the same value but SQL Plus will convert them correctly).
To avoid this error, consider using an explicit cast of the expression in the where clause to a timestamp type (timestamp without timezone), in this way:
Alternatively you can explicitely set the session time zone to, for example '-05:00' - for New York standard (winter) time,
using
ALTER SESSION time_zone = '-05:00', or by setting ORA_SDTZ environment variable in all client's environments,see this link for details: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10729/ch4datetime.htm#NLSPG263
But it also depends on what really is stored in the timestamp column in the table, for example what a timestamp
2014-07-01 15:00:00represents in fact, is it a "winter time" or a "summer time" ?CURRENT_TIMESTAMPfunction returns a value of datatype TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONEsee this link: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/functions037.htm
While comparing timestamps and dates, Oracle implicitely converts the data to the more precise data type using the session time zone !
See this link --> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e10729/ch4datetime.htm#NLSPG251
In our particular case, Oracle casts
timestampcolumn to thetimestamp with time zonetype.Oracle determines a session timezone from the client environment.
You can determine current session timezone using this query:
For example on my PC (Win 7), when the option ""Automatically adjust clock for Daylight Saving Time" is checked, this query returns (under SQLDeveloper):
When i uncheck this option in Windows and then restart SQLDeveloper, it gives:
The former session timezone is a timezone with a region name, for which Oracle uses the Daylight Saving Time rules for this region in date calculations:
The latter timezone uses a fixed offset "+01:00" (always the "Winter time"), and Oracle does not apply any DST rules for it, it simply adds the fixed offset.
Please note, for curiosity's sake, that
Yresults in the above represent two different times !!!014-05-29 01:30:00 EUROPE/BELGRADEis not the same as:2014-05-29 01:30:00 +01:00but actually this:
014-05-29 01:30:00 EUROPE/BELGRADEis equal to:2014-05-29 01:30:00 +02:00The above is only to make you aware of how simple "box un-checking" could affect your queries, and where to dig for a reason when users complain "this query worked fine in January, but gave wrong results in July".
And still on the topic of ORA-01878 - let say my session is
EUROPE/Warsawand my table containts this timestamp (without time zone)Note that in my region the DST change, in 2014 year, occurs on 30 of march at 2:00 a.m.
It simply means that on march 30, at 2:00 at night, I must wake up and shift my watch forward from 2:00 to 3:00 ;)
Oracle knows, that this timestamp is not valid in my region according to DST rules, because there is no time 2:30 on 30 of march - at 2:00 the clock is moved to 3:00, and there is no time 2:30. Therefore Oracle throws the error ORA-01878.
However this query works perfectly fine:
And this is a reason of this error - your table contains timestamps like
2014-03-09 2:30or so (for New York, where DST shifts occur on 9 of March and 2 of November), and Oracle doesn't know how to convert them from timestamp (without TZ) to timestamp with TZ.The last question - why the query with
>=doesn't work, but the query with<=works fine ?They work/don'n work, because SQLDeveloper returns only first 50 rows (maybe 100 ? It depends on settings). The query doesn't read the whole table, it stops when first 50(100) rows are fetched.
Change the "working" query to, for example:
This force the query to read all rows in the table, and the error will appear, I'am 100% sure.