I have a script running some Mercurial commands in non-interactive mode on a build server. One of the commands merges two branches and there is always a conflict in the .hgtags
file during the merge because of the way the build scripts are set up.
How can I force Mercurial to always merge the .hgtags
file using changes from both files, first from one, then from the other?
For example, if I the files to merge were
A
B
C
and
A
B
D
I would like the result to be
A
B
C
D
I am guessing I will need a custom merge tool. What tool provides this functionality?
You can not automatically resolve merge-conflicts by performing unattended merge. Without merge (i.e. selecting "only my" or "only other") it will work.
I'm afraid, you have badly planned workflow - build-server must not perform any actions, which modify sources. It's task for human and human's choice.
But I suppose, exact data inside .hgtags have to value for build-server (it uses own clone, not populated to anybody, I hope?!), thus you can define any merge-policy in command and have (bad, with data-loss) .hgtags merged
BTW, "first from one, then from the other" in any language, using only formal logic, for pair
and
means
ABCABD
resultYou should try diffmerge, it's awesome!
You don't actually need to merge the .hgtags file. It can be different on different branches and Mercurial will correctly list all tags across all branches.
We use the
merge-patterns
configuration option to tell Mercurial to use the local branch when doing merges of .hgtags. Add the following to your repository's hgrc file:When doing a merge involving the .hgtags file, .hgtags will show as modified, but not be changed.
Please see the answer below by Magras de La Mancha for better solution with Mercurial 3.1. The below is a simpler and more naive solution for older versions of Mercurial.
Yes, you need to configure a custom merge tool for your
.hgtags
file. Mercurial doesn't provide any special merge tool for.hgtags
, you're expected to merge it by hand using your normal three-way merge tool.Conflicts in the
.hgtags
file can have two types:Silly conflicts: This is the situation you have and there is not really a conflict here. What happens is that one branch has
and the other branch has
Each tag refers to exactly one changeset, so there's no conflict here. The merge should of course be the union on of the two files:
Real conflicts: There one branch has
and the other branch has
There is a real conflict here:
hg tag C
was done on both branches, but the tags refer to different changesets. Resolving this is a manual task.If you can guarantee that you'll only have silly conflicts and that you only have one tag per changeset, then you can use
to generate a new
.hgtags
file. The key insight is that Mercurial knows how to merge tags internally! It does this all the time when you have two heads with different.hgtags
files. The above template simply generates a new.hgtags
file based on this internal merge.If you might have more than one tag per changeset, then the above wont work — all the tags are printed on one line so you get a tag
foo bar
instead of two tagsfoo
andbar
. You can then use this style file instead:It outputs one line per tag, not changeset. You save this style somewhere and configure a merge tool:
You now have automatic tag merges. There are some caveats:
Three or more heads: The technique only works if you have two heads at the time of merging. If you have three heads or more, it's possible for a deleted tag to re-appear. If you have heads X, Y, and Z, and the tag
A
is deleted in X, then Mercurial is normally able to figure out thatA
is deleted overall. It does this based on a000...0 A
line in the.hgtags
file in X. However, if you merge X and Y to get W, then the approach suggested will not contain any such000...0 A
line. The definition ofA
from Z will now suddenly take effect and re-introduceA
.Real conflicts: If you have real conflicts in
.hgtags
, then the above method will silently pick the tag from the most recent head for you. The merge tool basically saveshg tags
in.hgtags
, and the behavior ofhg tags
with multiple heads is explained in the wiki. Sincehg tags
unconditionally reads and silently merges the.hgtags
file from all heads, there's nothing we can do about it with this simple approach. Dealing with this would require a bigger script that reads the two.hgtags
files and detects the conflict.Mercurial 3.1 (2014-08-01) introduced internal:tagmerge. It's marked as experimental so be careful. Here is preamble from changeset (you can find more details about algorithm if you follow the link):
tagmerge works only with tag files, so to use it you should set merge-patterns. To do this on per command basis use --config option:
hg merge -r REV --config merge-patterns..hgtags=internal:tagmerge
Or to do this on per repository basis add to your repo config
.hg/hgrc
this: