I have the following situation: I made some commits to my local repository, and then a huge merge of another branch (~150 commits) into the master - it had a lot of conflicts in it.
Now, I want to move a commit I made before the merge to be after it before pushing.
Normally, I would use "rebase -i" for it.
Unfortunately, the default behavior is to break the one-merge-commit I did that actually added 150 more commits to master into separate commits (I understand it's like if I would use rebase instead of merge to begin with) - which is bad behavior for me for several reasons.
I discovered the '-p' flag for rebase, which preserves merges, and was very happy about it. Unfortunately, this actually applied the same merge again, and forgot all about my hard work in conflict resolving. Again - bad behavior!
Is there a solution for what I want? Using rebase -i after merge to re-order or edit specific commits without having to repeat my post-merge operations?
Thanks!
I used
rerere-train.sh
from user @Jefromi's answer. However I had this error:From this http://kernel.opensuse.org/cgit/kernel-source/commit/?h=linux-next&id=d52b9f00588bb18d7f7a0e043eea15e6c27ec40c I saw this:
After downloading an older version - 2.3.4 portable - I managed to make
rerere-train.sh
work.I've made a script to do this here. See the open issues for known limitations.
You'll need to first install
rerere-train.sh
onto your PATH. On Fedora this can be done with:Here's what the rerere-train.sh script I mentioned in my comment does - essentially it redoes the merge, uses your resolution, and just lets rerere see it. You could do this manually just for your single commit if you like:
But you could also just set
rerere.enabled
to true, and do those steps minus the direct calls togit rerere
- and you'd be set in the future, with rerere automatically being run whenever you resolve conflicts. This is what I do - it's awesome.If you want to run the script directly, you'll probably want to run it with arguments like
rerere-train.sh ^<commit before the merge> <current branch>
. (The^commit
notation means "don't walk past this into the history", so it won't bother doing this for all the merge commits in your repo.)However you get rerere to do its thing, you should end up with the desired resolution recorded. That means you can go ahead and do your rebase -i, and when you run into the conflict, rerere will REuse the REcorded REsolution. Just a heads-up: it still leaves the files marked as conflicted in the index, so that you can inspect them, and make sure that what it did makes sense. Once you do, use
git add
to check them in as if you'd resolved the conflicts yourself, and go on as usual!The
git-rerere
manpage contains a very nice, lengthy description of normal use of rerere, which doesn't ever involve actually calling rerere - it's all done automatically. And a note it doesn't emphasize: it's all based on conflict hunks, so it can reuse a resolution even if the conflict ends up in a completely different place, as long as it's still the same textual conflict.