jQuery/Javascript - How to wait for manipulated DO

2020-01-28 08:30发布

站内问答 / JavaScript
1056 4 5

What I'm trying to do is to update a simple div to say "Processing..." before executing a CPU-intensive script (it takes 3-12 seconds to run, no AJAX) then update the div to say "Finished!" when done.

What I'm seeing is the div never gets updated with "Processing...". If I set a breakpoint immediately after that command, then the div text does get updated, so I know the syntax is correct. Same behavior in IE9, FF6, Chrome13.

Even when bypassing jQuery and using basic raw Javascript, I see the same issue.

You'd think this would have an easy answer. However, since the jQuery .html() and .text() don't have a callback hook, that's not an option. It's also not animated, so there is no .queue to manipulate.

You can test this yourselves using the sample code I prepared below that shows both the jQuery and Javascript implementations with a 5 second high-CPU function. The code is easy to follow. When you click either the button or the link, you never see "Processing..."

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.6.1/jquery.min.js" ></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
function addSecs(d, s) {return new Date(d.valueOf()+s*1000);}
function doRun() {
    document.getElementById('msg').innerHTML = 'Processing JS...';
    start = new Date();
    end = addSecs(start,5);
    do {start = new Date();} while (end-start > 0);
    document.getElementById('msg').innerHTML = 'Finished JS';   
}
$(function() {
    $('button').click(function(){
        $('div').text('Processing JQ...');  
        start = new Date();
        end = addSecs(start,5);
        do {start = new Date();} while (end-start > 0);
        $('div').text('Finished JQ');   
    });
});
</script>
</head>
<body>
    <div id="msg">Not Started</div>
    <button>jQuery</button>
    <a href="#" onclick="doRun()">javascript</a>
</body>
</html>

4条回答
戒情不戒烟
2楼-- · 2020-01-28 08:40

I had to wait for jQuery to manipulate the DOM and then grap the changes (load form fields multiple times into a form, then to submit it). The DOM grew and the insertion took longer and longer. I saved the changes using ajax to have to user to be able to continue where he left off.

This did NOT WORK as intended:

jQuery('.parentEl').prepend('<p>newContent</p>');
doSave(); // wrapping it into timeout was to short as well sometimes

Since jQuery functions like .prepend() do continue the chain only when done, the following seemed to do the trick:

jQuery('.parentEl').prepend('<p>newContent</p>').queue(function() {
  doSave();
});
查看更多
0人赞 添加讨论(0) 举报
女痞
3楼-- · 2020-01-28 08:41

You have a loop that runs for 5 seconds and freezes the web browser during that time. Since the web browser is frozen it can't do any rendering. You should be using setTimeout() instead of a loop, but I'm assuming that loop is just a replacement for a CPU intensive function that takes a while? You can use setTimeout to give the browser a chance to render before executing your function:

jQuery:

$(function() {
    $('button').click(function(){
        (function(cont){
            $('div').text('Processing JQ...');  
            start = new Date();
            end = addSecs(start,5);
            setTimeout(cont, 1);
        })(function(){
            do {start = new Date();} while (end-start > 0);
            $('div').text('Finished JQ');   
        })
    });
});

Vanilla JS:

document.getElementsByTagName('a')[0].onclick = function(){
    doRun(function(){
         do {start = new Date();} while (end-start > 0);
         document.getElementById('msg').innerHTML = 'Finished JS';   
    });
    return false;
};

function doRun(cont){
    document.getElementById('msg').innerHTML = 'Processing JS...';
    start = new Date();
    end = addSecs(start,5);
    setTimeout(cont, 1);
}

You should also remember to always declare all variables using the var keyword, and avoid exposing them to the global scope. Here is a JSFiddle:

http://jsfiddle.net/Paulpro/ypQ6m/

查看更多
0人赞 添加讨论(0) 举报
\"骚年 ilove
4楼-- · 2020-01-28 08:49

As of 2019 one uses double requesAnimationFrame to skip a frame instead of creating a race condition using setTimeout.

....
function doRun() {
    document.getElementById('msg').innerHTML = 'Processing JS...';
    requestAnimationFrame(() =>
    requestAnimationFrame(function(){
         start = new Date();
         end = addSecs(start,5);
         do {start = new Date();} while (end-start > 0);
         document.getElementById('msg').innerHTML = 'Finished Processing';   
    }))
}
...
查看更多
0人赞 添加讨论(0) 举报
姐就是有狂的资本
5楼-- · 2020-01-28 08:56

set it to processing, then do a setTimeout to prevent the cpu intensive task from running until after the div has been updated.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.6.1/jquery.min.js" ></script>
<script>
function addSecs(d, s) {return new Date(d.valueOf()+s*1000);}
function doRun() {
    document.getElementById('msg').innerHTML = 'Processing JS...';
    setTimeout(function(){
         start = new Date();
         end = addSecs(start,5);
         do {start = new Date();} while (end-start > 0);
         document.getElementById('msg').innerHTML = 'Finished Processing';   
    },10);
}
$(function() {
    $('button').click(doRun);
});    
</script>
    </head>
<body>
    <div id="msg">Not Started</div>
    <button>jQuery</button>
    <a href="#" onclick="doRun()">javascript</a>
</body>
</html>

you can modify the setTimeout delay as needed, it may need to be larger for slower machines/browsers.

Edit:

You could also use an alert or a confirm dialog to allow the page time to update.

document.getElementById('msg').innerHTML = 'Processing JS...';
if ( confirm( "This task may take several seconds. Do you wish to continue?" ) ) {
     // run code here
}
查看更多
0人赞 添加讨论(0) 举报
登录 后发表回答
相关问题
查看全部
相关文章
查看全部
收藏的人(5)