This is a challenge to come up with the most elegant JavaScript, Ruby or other solution to a relatively trivial problem.
This problem is a more specific case of the Longest common substring problem. I need to only find the longest common starting substring in an array. This greatly simplifies the problem.
For example, the longest substring in [interspecies, interstelar, interstate]
is "inters". However, I don't need to find "ific" in [specifics, terrific]
.
I've solved the problem by quickly coding up a solution in JavaScript as a part of my answer about shell-like tab-completion (test page here). Here is that solution, slightly tweaked:
function common_substring(data) {
var i, ch, memo, idx = 0
do {
memo = null
for (i=0; i < data.length; i++) {
ch = data[i].charAt(idx)
if (!ch) break
if (!memo) memo = ch
else if (ch != memo) break
}
} while (i == data.length && idx < data.length && ++idx)
return (data[0] || '').slice(0, idx)
}
This code is available in this Gist along with a similar solution in Ruby. You can clone the gist as a git repo to try it out:
$ git clone git://gist.github.com/257891.git substring-challenge
I'm not very happy with those solutions. I have a feeling they might be solved with more elegance and less execution complexity—that's why I'm posting this challenge.
I'm going to accept as an answer the solution I find the most elegant or concise. Here is for instance a crazy Ruby hack I come up with—defining the &
operator on String:
# works with Ruby 1.8.7 and above
class String
def &(other)
difference = other.to_str.each_char.with_index.find { |ch, idx|
self[idx].nil? or ch != self[idx].chr
}
difference ? self[0, difference.last] : self
end
end
class Array
def common_substring
self.inject(nil) { |memo, str| memo.nil? ? str : memo & str }.to_s
end
end
Solutions in JavaScript or Ruby are preferred, but you can show off clever solution in other languages as long as you explain what's going on. Only code from standard library please.
Update: my favorite solutions
I've chosen the JavaScript sorting solution by kennebec as the "answer" because it struck me as both unexpected and genius. If we disregard the complexity of actual sorting (let's imagine it's infinitely optimized by the language implementation), the complexity of the solution is just comparing two strings.
Other great solutions:
- "regex greed" by FM takes a minute or two to grasp, but then the elegance of it hits you. Yehuda Katz also made a regex solution, but it's more complex
commonprefix
in Python — Roberto Bonvallet used a feature made for handling filesystem paths to solve this problem- Haskell one-liner is short as if it were compressed, and beautiful
- the straightforward Ruby one-liner
Thanks for participating! As you can see from the comments, I learned a lot (even about Ruby).
Yet another way to do it: use regex greed.
And the one-liner, courtesy of mislav (50 characters):
i for i in range(min(map(len, a)))
, number of maximum lookups can't be greater than the length of the shortest string; in this example this would evaluate to[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
len(set(map(lambda e: e[i], a)))
, 1) create an array of thei-th
character for each string in the list; 2) make a set out of it; 3) determine the size of the set[i for i in range(min(map(len, a))) if len(set(map(lambda e: e[i], a))) == 1]
, include just the characters, for which the size of the set is 1 (all characters at that position were the same ..); here it would evaluate to[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
finally take the
max
, add one, and get the substring ...Note: the above does not work for
a = ['intersyate', 'intersxate', 'interstate', 'intersrate']
, but this would:My Javascript solution:
IMOP, using sort is too tricky. My solution is compare letter by letter through looping the array. Return string if letter is not macthed.
This is my solution:
Just for the fun of it, here's a version written in (SWI-)PROLOG:
Running:
Gives:
Explanation:
(SWI-)PROLOG treats strings as lists of character codes (numbers). All the predicate
common_pre/2
does is recursively pattern-match to select the first code (C
) from the head of the first list (string,[C|Cs]
) in the list of all lists (all strings,[[C|Cs]|Ss]
), and appends the matching codeC
to the result iff it is common to all (remaining) heads of all lists (strings), else it terminates.Nice, clean, simple and efficient... :)
Oftentimes it's more elegant to use a mature open source library instead of rolling your own. Then, if it doesn't completely suit your needs, you can extend it or modify it to improve it, and let the community decide if that belongs in the library.
diff-lcs is a good Ruby gem for least common substring.
This is by no means elegant, but if you want concise:
Ruby, 71 chars
If you want that unrolled it looks like this: