I've been searching how to manage a REST API versions using Spring 3.2.x, but I haven't find anything that is easy to maintain. I'll explain first the problem I have, and then a solution... but I do wonder if I'm re-inventing the wheel here.
I want to manage the version based on the Accept header, and for example if a request has the Accept header application/vnd.company.app-1.1+json
, I want spring MVC to forward this to the method that handles this version. And since not all methods in an API change in the same release, I don't want to go to each of my controllers and change anything for a handler that hasn't changed between versions. I also don't want to have the logic to figure out which version to use in the controller themselves (using service locators) as Spring is already discovering which method to call.
So taken an API with versions 1.0, to 1.8 where a handler was introduced in version 1.0 and modified in v1.7, I would like handle this in the following way. Imagine that the code is inside a controller, and that there's some code that is able to extract the version from the header. (The following is invalid in Spring)
@RequestMapping(...)
@VersionRange(1.0,1.6)
@ResponseBody
public Object method1() {
// so something
return object;
}
@RequestMapping(...) //same Request mapping annotation
@VersionRange(1.7)
@ResponseBody
public Object method2() {
// so something
return object;
}
This is not possible in spring as the 2 methods have the same RequestMapping
annotation and Spring fails to load. The idea is that the VersionRange
annotation can define an open or closed version range. The first method is valid from versions 1.0 to 1.6, while the second for version 1.7 onwards (including the latest version 1.8). I know that this approach breaks if someone decides to pass version 99.99, but that's something I'm OK to live with.
Now, since the above is not possible without a serious rework of how spring works, I was thinking of tinkering with the way handlers matched to requests, in particular to write my own ProducesRequestCondition
, and have the version range in there. For example
Code:
@RequestMapping(..., produces = "application/vnd.company.app-[1.0-1.6]+json)
@ResponseBody
public Object method1() {
// so something
return object;
}
@RequestMapping(..., produces = "application/vnd.company.app-[1.7-]+json)
@ResponseBody
public Object method2() {
// so something
return object;
}
In this way, I can have closed or open version ranges defined in the produces part of the annotation. I'm working on this solution now, with the problem that I still had to replace some core Spring MVC classes (RequestMappingInfoHandlerMapping
, RequestMappingHandlerMapping
and RequestMappingInfo
), which I don't like, because it means extra work whenever I decide to upgrade to a newer version of spring.
I would appreciate any thoughts... and especially, any suggestion to do this in a simpler, easier to maintain way.
Edit
Adding a bounty. To get the bounty, please answer the question above without suggesting to have this logic in the controller themselves. Spring already has a lot of logic to select which controller method to call, and I want to piggyback on that.
Edit 2
I've shared the original POC (with some improvements) in github: https://github.com/augusto/restVersioning
You can use AOP, around interception
Consider having a request mapping which receives all the
/**/public_api/*
and in this method do nothing;After
The only constraint is that all has to be in the same controller.
For AOP configuration have a look at http://www.mkyong.com/spring/spring-aop-examples-advice/
I have implemented a solution which handles PERFECTLY the problem with rest versioning.
General Speaking there are 3 major approaches for rest versioning:
Path-based approch, in which the client defines the version in URL:
Content-Type header, in which the client defines the version in Accept header:
Custom Header, in which the client defines the version in a custom header.
The problem with the first approach is that if you change the version let's say from v1 -> v2, probably you need to copy-paste the v1 resources that haven't changed to v2 path
The problem with the second approach is that some tools like http://swagger.io/ cannot distinct between operations with same path but different Content-Type (check issue https://github.com/OAI/OpenAPI-Specification/issues/146)
The solution
Since i am working a lot with rest documentation tools, i prefer to use the first approach. My solution handles the problem with the first approach, so you don't need to copy-paste the endpoint to the new version.
Let's say we have v1 and v2 versions for the User controller:
The requirement is if i request the v1 for the user resource i have to take the "User V1" repsonse, otherwise if i request the v2, v3 and so on i have to take the "User V2" response.
In order to implement this in spring, we need to override the default RequestMappingHandlerMapping behavior:
}
The implementation reads the version in the URL and asks from spring to resolve the URL .In case this URL does not exists (for example the client requested v3) then we try with v2 and so one until we find the most recent version for the resource.
In order to see the benefits from this implementation, let's say we have two resources: User and Company:
Let's say we made a change in company "contract" that breaks the client. So we implement the
http://localhost:9001/api/v2/company
and we ask from client to change to v2 instead on v1.So the new requests from client are:
instead of:
The best part here is that with this solution the client will get the user information from v1 and company information from v2 without the need to create a new (same) endpoint from user v2!
Rest Documentation As i said before the reason i select the URL-based versioning approach is that some tools like swagger do not document differently the endpoints with the same URL but different content type. With this solution, both endpoints are displayed since have different URL:
GIT
Solution implementation at: https://github.com/mspapant/restVersioningExample/
I just created a custom solution. I'm using the
@ApiVersion
annotation in combination with@RequestMapping
annotation inside@Controller
classes.Example:
Implementation:
ApiVersion.java annotation:
ApiVersionRequestMappingHandlerMapping.java (this is mostly copy and paste from
RequestMappingHandlerMapping
):Injection into WebMvcConfigurationSupport:
The
@RequestMapping
annotation supports aheaders
element that allows you to narrow the matching requests. In particular you can use theAccept
header here.This isn't exactly what you're describing, since it doesn't directly handle ranges, but the element does support the * wildcard as well as !=. So at least you could get away with using a wildcard for cases where all versions support the endpoint in question, or even all minor versions of a given major version (e.g. 1.*).
I don't think I've actually used this element before (if I have I don't remember), so I'm just going off the documentation at
http://docs.spring.io/spring/docs/current/javadoc-api/org/springframework/web/bind/annotation/RequestMapping.html
Regardless whether versioning can be avoided by doing backwards compatible changes (which might not always possible when you are bound by some corporate guidelines or your API clients are implemented in a buggy way and would break even if they should not) the abstracted requirement is an interesting one:
How can I do a custom request mapping that does arbitrary evaluations of header values from the request without doing the evaluation in the method body?
As described in this SO answer you actually can have the same
@RequestMapping
and use a different annotation to differentiate during the actual routing that happens during runtime. To do so, you will have to:VersionRange
.RequestCondition<VersionRange>
. Since you will have something like a best-match algorithm you will have to check whether methods annotated with otherVersionRange
values provide a better match for the current request.VersionRangeRequestMappingHandlerMapping
based on the annotation and request condition (as described in the post How to implement @RequestMapping custom properties ).VersionRangeRequestMappingHandlerMapping
before using the defaultRequestMappingHandlerMapping
(e.g. by setting its order to 0).This wouldn't require any hacky replacements of Spring components but uses the Spring configuration and extension mechanisms so it should work even if you update your Spring version (as long as the new version supports these mechanisms).
I would still recommend using URL's for versioning because in URLs @RequestMapping supports patterns and path parameters, which format could be specified with regexp.
And to handle client upgrades (which you mentioned in comment) you can use aliases like 'latest'. Or have unversioned version of api which uses latest version (yeah).
Also using path parameters you can implement any complex version handling logic, and if you already want to have ranges, you very well might want something more soon enough.
Here is a couple of examples:
Based on the last approach you can actually implement something like what you want.
For example you can have a controller that contains only method stabs with version handling.
In that handling you look (using reflection/AOP/code generation libraries) in some spring service/component or in the same class for method with the same name/signature and required @VersionRange and invoke it passing all parameters.