I've migrated my application to log4j 2, and I've configured it via log4j2.xml
However, some of the libraries I'm using depend on log4j 1. If I run the application using:
-Dlog4j.configurationFile=path/to/log4j2.xml
log4j 1 complains about not finding a configuration file. I'm using the log4j 1.x bridge provided by log4j 2, log4j-1.2-api-2.0-rc1.jar. Is it possible to configure both using a single log4j2.xml?
An alternative I've tried is configuring both log4j and log4j2 together:
-Dlog4j.configurationFile=path/to/log4j2.xml -Dlog4j.configuration=path/to/log4j.xml
My concern is fragmentation of my logging configuration files and output. I'm also concerned about possible conflicts between log4j.xml and log4j2.xml. e.g. the logfile error.log is configured to use a FileAppender in log4j 1 and a RollingFileAppender in log4j 2.
Any advice?
[note]
This is the error I'm seeing:
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.activemq.util.ThreadPoolUtils).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more info.
The version of log4j 2 I'm using is log4j 2.0 rc1.
[answer]
Seems like activemq-5.8.0.jar was bundled with log4j 1. The solution was simply to load the log4j 1.x bridge before activemq.
In a maven project using log4j2, it is possible to exclude log4j from modules that use it, in the pom, in order to enable log4j2 to take over:
More info about that in the log4j FAQ
I would recommend using the log4j-1.2 adapter that is included in the log4j2 distribution. That way, any libraries coded to the log4j-1.2 API will work with log4j2 without any code changes.
Your classpath should include:
Your classpath should not include:
See also http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/faq.html#which_jars