I have a controller that I wrote that I use in multiple places in my app with ng-include
and ng-repeat
, like this:
<div
ng-repeat="item in items"
ng-include="'item.html'"
ng-controller="ItemController"
></div>
In the controller/template, I expect the item
value to exist, and the whole thing is built around this idea. Now, though, I need to use the controller in a slightly different way, without the ng-repeat
, but still need to be able to pass in an item
. I saw ng-init
and thought it could do what I needed, like this:
<div
ng-init="item = leftItem"
ng-include="'item.html'"
ng-controller="ItemController"
></div>
<div
ng-init="item = rightItem"
ng-include="'item.html'"
ng-controller="ItemController"
></div>
But that does not seem to be working. Anyone have any ideas how I can pass in a variable for scope in a singular instance like this?
Edit:
The controller above this is loading in the leftItem
and rightItem
values, something like this:
.controller('MainController', function($scope, ItemModel) {
ItemModel.loadItems()
.then(function(items) {
$scope.$apply(function() {
$scope.leftItem = items.left;
$scope.rightItem = items.right;
});
});
});
ng-init is better for this I think.
Late to the party, but there is a little angular 'hack' to achieve this without implementing a dumb directive.
Adding a built-in directive that will extend your controller's scope (like ng-if) everywhere you use the ng-include will actually let you isolate the variable name for all the included scopes.
So:
You can then bind your template item.html to the item variable several times with different items.
Here is a plunker to achieve what you want
The problem was the item keeps changing in the controller scope that only holds one reference to item variable which is erased at each onload instruction.
Introducing a directive that extends the current scope, lets you have a isolated scope for all the ng-include. As a consequence the item reference is preserved and unique in all extended scope.
LOVE @Tanin's answer. solves so many problems at once and in a very elegant way. For those of you like me who don't know Coffeescript, here's the javascript...
NOTE: For reasons I'm too new to understand, this code requires you to quote your template name once, rather than ng-include's requirement to twice-quote your template names, ie.
<div ng-include-template="template-name.html" ... >
instead of<div ng-include-template="'template-name.html'" ... >
I ended up rewriting it into a directive and binding the needed value in the scope with
You can use the
onload
attribute thatngInclude
provides to do this:Link to the documentation.
EDIT
Try doing something like this in the parent scope:
Then when the asynchronous data is received, store the data on
dataHolder
:Now when
ng-include
loads the template, it will create a child scope that inherits the properties of the parent. So$scope.dataHolder
will be defined in this child scope (initially as an empty object). But when your asynchronous data is received, the reference to the empty object should then contain the newly received data.Above will not work for second level attributes, like
<div ng-include-template=... ng-include-variables="{ id: var.id }">
. Notice thevar.id
.Updated directive(ugly, but works):