SQL Server - boolean literal?

2019-01-13 19:24发布

How to write literal boolean value in SQL Server? See sample use:

select * from SomeTable where PSEUDO_TRUE

another sample:

if PSEUDO_TRUE
begin
  select 'Hello, SQL!'
end 

Note: The query above has nothing to do with how I'm going to use it. It is just to test the literal boolean.

12条回答
趁早两清
2楼-- · 2019-01-13 20:03

You should consider that a "true value" is everything except 0 and not only 1. So instead of 1=1 you should write 1<>0.

Because when you will use parameter (@param <> 0) you could have some conversion issue.

The most know is Access which translate True value on control as -1 instead of 1.

查看更多
仙女界的扛把子
3楼-- · 2019-01-13 20:05

SQL Server doesn't have a boolean data type. As @Mikael has indicated, the closest approximation is the bit. But that is a numeric type, not a boolean type. In addition, it only supports 2 values - 0 or 1 (and one non-value, NULL).

SQL (standard SQL, as well as T-SQL dialect) describes a Three valued logic. The boolean type for SQL should support 3 values - TRUE, FALSE and UNKNOWN (and also, the non-value NULL). So bit isn't actually a good match here.

Given that SQL Server has no support for the data type, we should not expect to be able to write literals of that "type".

查看更多
\"骚年 ilove
4楼-- · 2019-01-13 20:07

How to write literal boolean value in SQL Server?
select * from SomeTable where PSEUDO_TRUE

There is no such thing.

You have to compare the value with something using = < > like .... The closest you get a boolean value in SQL Server is the bit. And that is an integer that can have the values null, 0 and 1.

查看更多
祖国的老花朵
5楼-- · 2019-01-13 20:11

According to Microsoft: syntax for searching is

[ WHERE <search_condition> ]*

And search condition is:

<search_condition> ::= 
    { [ NOT ] <predicate> | ( <search_condition> ) } 
    [ { AND | OR } [ NOT ] { <predicate> | ( <search_condition> ) } ] 
[ ,...n ] 

And predicate is:

<predicate> ::= 
    { expression { = | < > | ! = | > | > = | ! > | < | < = | ! < } expression 

As you can see, you always have to write two expressions to compare. Here search condition is boolean expression like 1=1, a!=b

Do not confuse search expressions with boolean constants like 'True' or 'False'. You can assign boolean constants to BIT variables

DECLARE @B BIT
SET @B='True'

but in TSQL you can not use boolean constants instead of boolean expressions like this:

SELECT * FROM Somewhere WHERE 'True'

It will not work.

But you can use boolean constants to build two-sided search expression like this:

SEARCH * FROM Somewhere WHERE 'True'='True' 
查看更多
劫难
6楼-- · 2019-01-13 20:11

This isn't mentioned in any of the other answers. If you want a value that orms (should) hydrate as boolean you can use

CONVERT(bit, 0) -- false CONVERT(bit, 1) -- true

This gives you a bit which is not a boolean. You cannot use that value in an if statement for example:

IF CONVERT(bit, 0)
BEGIN
    print 'Yay'
END

woudl not parse. You would still need to write

IF CONVERT(bit, 0) = 0

So its not terribly useful.

查看更多
混吃等死
7楼-- · 2019-01-13 20:11

SQL Server does not have literal true or false values. You'll need to use the 1=1 method (or similar) in the rare cases this is needed.

One option is to create your own named variables for true and false

DECLARE @TRUE bit
DECLARE @FALSE bit
SET @TRUE = 1
SET @FALSE = 0

select * from SomeTable where @TRUE = @TRUE

But these will only exist within the scope of the batch (you'll have to redeclare them in every batch in which you want to use them)

查看更多
登录 后发表回答