I am after a view which will look like my first attached picture however with right hand column populated and not blank. The logic is as follows:
The data must be for current financial period. Therfore April will be 2011 and March will be 2012 and so on.
The calculation for Days Available for the single months will be:
Total number of working days (Monday-Friday) minus any bank holidays that fall into that particular month, for that particular financial year (Which we have saved in a table - see second image).
Column names for holiday table left to right: holidaytypeid, name, holstart, holend. Table name: holidaytable
To work out the cumulative months 'Days Available' it will be a case of summing already populated data for the single months. E.g April-May will be April and May's data SUMMED and so on and so forth.
I need the SQL query in perfect format so that this can be pasted straight in and will work (i.e with the correct column names and table names)
Thanks for looking.
If you do this for more than 1 year you will need to change the line:
Otherwise you'll get an error - The number needs to be higher than the number of days you are querying.
EDIT
I have just come accross this old answer of mine and really don't like it, there are so many things that I now consider bad practise, so am going to correct all the issues:
DATEFIRST
and useDATEPART
LEFT JOIN/IS NULL
instead ofNOT EXISTS
to elimiate records from the holiday table. In SQL Server LEFT JOIN/IS NULL is less efficient than NOT EXISTSThese are all minor things, but they are things I would critique (at least in my head if not outloud) when reviewing someone else's query, so can't really not correct my own work! Rewriting the query would give.
As a final point, this query becomes much simpler with a calendar table that stores all dates, and has flags for working days, holidays etc, rather than using a holiday table that just stores holidays.
Let me add few cents to this post. Just got assignment to calculate difference between planned hours and actual hour. The code below was converted to a function. So far no issue with the logic: