Some days ago I made a similar question in order to generate LESS variables with a LOOP
.
Today I start from the same topic with a similar topic. I have the following colorizer theme:
// Colors
@color-gray: rgb(225,225,225);
@color-black: rgb(15,15,15);
@color-blue: rgb(37,117,237);
@color-red: rgb(222,44,59);
@color-yellow: rgb(255,200,0);
@color-green: rgb(44,159,66);
@color-white: rgb(255,255,255);
// Colors Dark
@color-gray-dark: rgb(179,182,183);
@color-black-dark: rgb(0,0,0);
@color-blue-dark: rgb(26,82,165);
@color-red-dark: rgb(178,35,47);
@color-yellow-dark: rgb(204,160,0);
@color-green-dark: rgb(35,127,53);
// Colors Light
@color-gray-light: rgb(240,240,240);
@color-black-light: rgb(55,55,55);
@color-blue-light: rgb(146,186,246);
@color-red-light: rgb(239,150,157);
@color-yellow-light: rgb(255,228,128);
@color-green-light: rgb(150,207,161);
Seven-phases-max already answered me:
There's no way to "generate" variables dynamically
So, how to optimize creation of a similar colorizer? If could be possible to generate variables, ideal behaviour should pass a "dark" or "light" parameter to a function that loops through each "standard" color variation and then generates dark or light version automatically.
Some suggestion about it?
I'm not sure if I fully understand your question, but not long ago I had to face a similar issue and solved it by using LESS mixins as functions, and based on a main color (e.g. background color), deciding which variant to use (light or dark).
E.g.
Not sure if it meets what you are looking for.
Cheers.