I'm trying to understand the functionalities of these methods. Could you provide me a simple usecase to understand theirs semantics?
From the documentation, for example, convertPoint:fromView: method is described as follows:
Converts a point from the coordinate system of a given view to that of the receiver.
What does the coordinate system mean? What about the receiver?
For example, does it make sense using convertPoint:fromView: like the following?
CGPoint p = [view1 convertPoint:view1.center fromView:view1];
Using NSLog utility, I've verified that p value coincides with view1's center.
Thank you in advance.
EDIT: for those interested in, I've created a simple code snippet to understand these methods.
UIView* view1 = [[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectMake(100, 100, 150, 200)];
view1.backgroundColor = [UIColor redColor];
NSLog(@"view1 frame: %@", NSStringFromCGRect(view1.frame));
NSLog(@"view1 center: %@", NSStringFromCGPoint(view1.center));
CGPoint originInWindowCoordinates = [self.window convertPoint:view1.bounds.origin fromView:view1];
NSLog(@"convertPoint:fromView: %@", NSStringFromCGPoint(originInWindowCoordinates));
CGPoint originInView1Coordinates = [self.window convertPoint:view1.frame.origin toView:view1];
NSLog(@"convertPoint:toView: %@", NSStringFromCGPoint(originInView1Coordinates));
In both cases self.window is the receiver. But there is a difference. In the first case the convertPoint parameter is expressed in view1 coordinates. The output is the following:
convertPoint:fromView: {100, 100}
In the second one, instead, the convertPoint is expressed in superview (self.window) coordinates. The output is the following:
convertPoint:toView: {0, 0}
Each view has its own coordinate system - with an origin at 0,0 and a width and height. This is described in the
bounds
rectangle of the view. Theframe
of the view, however, will have its origin at the point within the bounds rectangle of its superview.The outermost view of your view hierarchy has it's origin at 0,0 which corresponds to the top left of the screen in iOS.
If you add a subview at 20,30 to this view, then a point at 0,0 in the subview corresponds to a point at 20,30 in the superview. This conversion is what those methods are doing.
Your example above is pointless (no pun intended) since it converts a point from a view to itself, so nothing will happen. You would more commonly find out where some point of a view was in relation to its superview - to test if a view was moving off the screen, for example:
The "receiver" is a standard objective-c term for the object that is receiving the message (methods are also known as messages) so in my example here the receiver is
superview
.Thank you all for posting the question and your answers: It helped me get this sorted out.
My view controller has it's normal view.
Inside that view there are a number of grouping views that do little more than give their child views a clean interaction with auto layout constraints.
Inside one of those grouping views I have an Add button that presents a popover view controller where the user enters some information.
During device rotation the view controller is alerted via the UIPopoverViewControllerDelegate call popoverController:willRepositionPopoverToRect:inView:
The essential part that comes from the explanation given by the first two answers above was that the rect I needed to convert from was the bounds of the add button, not its frame.
I haven't tried this with a more complex view hierarchy, but I suspect that by using the view supplied in the method call (inView:) we get around the complications of multi-tiered leaf view kinds of ugliness.
I read the answer and understand the mechanics but I think the final example is not correct. According to the API doc, the center property of a view contains the known center point of the view in the superview’s coordinate system.
If this is the case, than I think it would not make sense to try to ask the superview to convert the center of a subview FROM the subview coordinate system because the value is not in the subview coordinate system. What would make sense is to do the opposite i.e. convert from the superview coordinate system to that of a subview...
You can do it in two ways (both should yield the same value):
or
Am I way off in understanding how this should work?
You can see below code so you can understand that how it actually works.
Every view in iOS have a coordinate system. A coordinate system is just like a graph, which has x axis(horizontal line) and y axis(vertical line). The point at which the lines interesect is called origin. A point is represented by (x, y). For example, (2, 1) means that the point is 2 pixels left, and 1 pixel down.
You can read up more about coordinate systems here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordinate_system
But what you need to know is that, in iOS, every view has it's OWN coordinate system, where the top left corner is the origin. X axis goes on increasing to the right, and y axis goes on increasing down.
For the converting points question, take this example.
There is a view, called V1, which is 100 pixels wide and 100 pixels high. Now inside that, there is another view, called V2, at (10, 10, 50, 50) which means that (10, 10) is the point in V1's coordinate system where the top left corner of V2 should be located, and (50, 50) is the width and height of V2. Now, take a point INSIDE V2's coordinate system, say (20, 20). Now, what would that point be inside V1's coordinate system? That is what the methods are for(of course you can calculate themselves, but they save you extra work). For the record, the point in V1 would be (30, 30).
Hope this helps.
Here's an explanation in plain English.
When you want to convert the rect of a subview (
aView
is a subview of[aView superview]
) to the coordinate space of another view (self
).