I am converting our svn repository to git. However, when I run "git svn clone" on our current svn repo, many revisions are getting skipped.
For example, svn revision 2 is skipped, but when I run "svn log -r 2" in our svn repo, there is an entry for it.
It's worth noting that when I just run "svn log" in our svn repo, revision 2 is not listed. It's only shown when referenced directly.
I'm assuming svn history was sort of deleted, but not really, at one point in the past.
How can I do the git svn clone and get all revisions even when deleted from svn, assuming that's the issue?
SVN will not have history deleted usually. I'm not sure if this is possible anyway. You should look at what was changed in that revision. My guess is that only paths were changed that are not part of the history you are converting. But to say this for sure I would need to see the revision changes and your
git-svn
command.But anyway, for a one-time migration
git-svn
is not the right tool for conversions of repositories or parts of repositories. It is a great tool if you want to use Git as frontend for an existing SVN server, but for one-time conversions you should not usegit-svn
, butsvn2git
which is much more suited for this use-case.There are plenty tools called
svn2git
, the probably best one is the KDE one from https://github.com/svn-all-fast-export/svn2git. I strongly recommend using thatsvn2git
tool. It is the best I know available out there and it is very flexible in what you can do with its rules files.You will be easily able to configure
svn2git
s rule file to produce the result you want from your current SVN layout, including any complex histories like yours that might exist and including producing several Git repos out of one SVN repo or combining different SVN repos into one Git repo cleanly in one run if you like.If you are not 100% about the history of your repository,
svneverever
from http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=763 is a great tool to investigate the history of an SVN repository when migrating it to Git.Even though
git-svn
or the nirvdrumsvn2git
is easier to start with, here are some further reasons why using the KDEsvn2git
instead ofgit-svn
is superior, besides its flexibility:svn2git
(if the correct one is used), this is especially the case for more complex histories with branches and merges and so ongit-svn
the tags contain an extra empty commit which also makes them not part of the branches, so a normalfetch
will not get them until you give--tags
to the command as by default only tags pointing to fetched branches are fetched also. With the proper svn2git tags are where they belongsvn2git
, withgit-svn
you will loose history eventuallysvn2git
you can also split one SVN repository into multiple Git repositories easilysvn2git
than withgit-svn
You see, there are many reasons why
git-svn
is worse and the KDEsvn2git
is superior. :-)