LDFLAGS usage in autotools with libtool

2019-08-15 12:55发布

Depending on the OS, I define a special LDFLAGS in my configure.ac:

AC_CANONICAL_HOST
if test "$host_os" = cygwin
then
    LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -Wl,-no-undefined"
    export LDFLAGS
fi
AC_SUBST([LDFLAGS])

The package uses AC_PROG_LIBTOOL and when LDFLAGS is passed to libtool, the -Wl prefix remains, and the linker doesn't understand the option. If I remove this prefix, the AC_PROG_CXX macro fails, because GCC chokes on -no-undefined by itself. What am I doing wrong?

LDFLAGS is not mentioned the Makefile.am, but I have made sure that it is honored in the libtool command by running make -n.

I'm using autoconf 2.69, automake 1.14, gmake 4.0 and gcc 4.8.2 under Cygwin 1.7.28(0.271/5/3)

Edit: I have a few dozen Makefile.ams, more than half of which are from external libraries -- I'd much prefer to control these flags from a central location.

2条回答
走好不送
2楼-- · 2019-08-15 12:57

Libtool has a -no-undefined option.

GNU ld has a --no-undefined option.

You should let libtool know about it from inside the Makefile.am, and let it take care of forwarding to the linker:

configure.ac

AC_CANONICAL_HOST
if test "$host_os" = cygwin
then
    EXTRA_LDFLAGS="-no-undefined"
fi
AC_SUBST([EXTRA_LDFLAGS])

Makefile.am

AM_LDFLAGS = $(EXTRA_LDFLAGS) ...

As a general rule, you should not mess around with CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS, etc from configure.ac, since the user might need to change them while invoking "make".

查看更多
孤傲高冷的网名
3楼-- · 2019-08-15 13:09

In ordered not to modify dozens of Makefiles, I have ended up using LDFLAGS. The trick was to set it after the AC_PROG_CXX macro:

AC_PROG_CXX
if test "$host_os" = cygwin
then
    LDFLAGS="-no-undefined $LDFLAGS"
fi
AC_SUBST([LDFLAGS])

This way, the macro that tests for a C++ compiler succeeds because LDFLAGS is pristine; but the actual codebase uses the extra flag.

By putting the $LDFLAGS substitution at the end, any user options from the environment take precedence at configure time; and overriding at make time with make LDFLAGS=... is still possible.

查看更多
登录 后发表回答