I'm trying to use the BETWEEN with column names instead of direct values, something like this:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE column1 BETWEEN column2 AND column3;
This is returning something like 17 rows, but if i write:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE (column1 <= column2 AND column1 >= column3) OR (column1 >= column2 AND column1 <= column3)
i get around 600 rows..
In both cases i only get rows where column1 value is actually the middle value, but 2nd method gives me much more results, so 1st method has something wrong with it.
I suspect the problem might be on using BETWEEN clause with column names, instead of pure values, and somehow SQL is converting the column names to actual values..its strange, but can someone enlighten me please?
Thanks
SELECT * FROM table WHERE column1 BETWEEN column2 AND column3; # gives 17 rows
is same as
SELECT * FROM table WHERE (column1 >= column2 AND column1 <= column3) # gives 17 rows
Because of your addition check of
(column1 <= column2 AND column1 >= column3)
which is OR
ed, you get additional rows.
Between A And B
assumes that A<B
, i.e., that the first expression in the Between, (A
), is less than the second expression, (B
) it does not check or execute with the opposite option.
e.g., if you put Where 3 Between 4 And 2
no rows will be returned:
or, if you write
Select Case When 3 Between 4 and 2 then 'true' else 'false' end
it will return false
Your logic for the two statements is not the same:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE (column1 <= column2 AND column1 >= column3) OR (column1 >= column2 AND column1 <= column3)
Has two clauses. Remove the first and you should have the same results as your between statement.
SELECT * FROM table WHERE (column1 >= column2 AND column1 <= column3)
(column1 <= column2 AND column1 >= column3)
These two conditions only yield TRUE
if the three values are ordered as follows:
column3 <= column1 <= column2
That is, the condition is equivalent to:
column1 BETWEEN column3 AND column2
Likewise,
(column1 >= column2 AND column1 <= column3)
implies this ordering:
column2 <= column1 <= column3
That is, the condition is equivalent to your first WHERE
clause, ie.:
column1 BETWEEN column2 AND column3
In both cases, column1
is the middle value for all query results, as you have already noticed.
And the two queries do yield different results because the first has a WHERE
clause of:
column1 BETWEEN column2 AND column3
whereas the second query effectively has a WHERE
clause of:
(column1 BETWEEN column2 AND column3) OR (column1 BETWEEN column3 AND column2)
(Which means that the order of the two right operands of the BETWEEN .. AND ..
operator is actually important.)