I have the following method with generic type:
T GetValue<T>();
I would like to limit T to primitive types such as int, string, float but not class type. I know I can define generic for class type like this:
C GetObject<C>() where C: class;
I am not sure if it is possible for primitive types and how if so.
You can use this to limit it to value types:
where C: struct
You also mention string. Unfortunately, strings won't be allowed as they are not value types.
Actually this does the job to certain extend:
public T Object<T>() where T :
struct, IComparable, IFormattable, IConvertible, IComparable<T>, IEquatable<T>
To limit to numeric types you can get some useful hints of the following samples defined for the ValueType class
Here's what you're looking for:
T GetObject<T>() where T : struct;
There is no generic constraint that matches that set of things cleanly. What is it that you actually want to do? For example, you can hack around it with runtime checks, such as a static ctor (for generic types - not so easy for generic methods)...
However; most times I see this, it is because people want one of:
- to be able to check items for equality: in which case use
EqualityComparer<T>.Default
- to be able to compare/sort items: in which case use
Comparer<T>.Default
- to be able to perform arithmetic: in which case use MiscUtil's support for generic operators
What are you actually trying to do in the method? It could be that you actually need C to implement IComparable, or someother interface. In which case you want something like
T GetObject<T> where T: IComparable