Is the following a legal fold expression?
template <std::size_t N, std::size_t... Ix>
bool in_range(std::index_sequence<Ix...>) {
return ((Ix < N) && ...);
}
It compiles with clang but not gcc
Is the following a legal fold expression?
template <std::size_t N, std::size_t... Ix>
bool in_range(std::index_sequence<Ix...>) {
return ((Ix < N) && ...);
}
It compiles with clang but not gcc
Clang is doing the correct thing, the grammar from the Folding expressions Proposal is as follows:
fold-expression:
( cast-expression fold-operator ... )
( ... fold-operator cast-expression )
( cast-expression fold-operator ... fold-operator cast-expression )
and contains the following wording that applies to this case (emphasis mine):
An expression of the form (... op e) where op is a fold-operator is called a unary left fold. An expression of the form (e op ...) where op is a fold-operator is called a unary right fold. Unary left folds and unary right folds are collectively called unary folds. In a unary fold, the cast-expression shall contain an unexpanded parameter pack.
and (Ix < N)
is indeed a cast-expression, so this looks valid. We can see the chain that gets us there, as follows from the grammar in section 5
:
cast-expression -> unary-expression -> postfix-expression ->
primary-expression -> (expression)
T.C. pointed out the following gcc bug report [c++1z] "binary expression in operand of fold-expression" error when folding an expression which reports a similar issue but it is still unconfirmed.
It looks like this is also broken in gcc for binary left and right folds, for example:
return ( (Ix < N) && ... && (N < 10) );
and:
return ( (N < 10) && ... && (Ix < N) );
GCC is wrong. This is bug 68377, presumably introduced by the fix for bug 67810.
fold-expression:
( cast-expression fold-operator ... )
[...]
primary-expression:
[...]
( expression )
[...]
postfix-expression:
primary-expression
[...]
unary-expression:
postfix-expression
[...]
cast-expression:
unary-expression
[...]
(Ix < N)
is of the form ( expression )
, therefore it is a primary-expression, therefore it is a postfix-expression, therefore it is a unary-expression, therefore it is a cast-expression, therefore it can be used as an operand of a fold-expression.