I have an open folder on my computer,
OpenFunctions\
____Template.py
function1.py
function2.py
......
functionx.py
This folder is experimental purpose for extend the ability of the whole app can doing. So let’s just think it is a quick and dry trying, no security consideration in this case.
My purpose is, if I drop a functionx.py
following the ____Template.py
, the app can know the new functions is available and will invoke the functions defined in this new joined file in someway – something like the plugin system, but should be a bit different.
So I wrote a ____inspect.py
may let application have an ability to know what has been inputed.
Here is the
____inspect.py
def get_this_file_defined_functions(name_filter = "__"):
import inspect, sys
f = inspect.getmembers(sys.modules[__name__], inspect.isfunction)
return [x for x in f if not x[0].startswith(name_filter)]
def get_this_module_sub_modules(name_filter = "__"):
import os.path, pkgutil
pkgpath = os.path.dirname(__file__)
m = [name for _, name, _ in pkgutil.iter_modules([pkgpath])]
return [x for x in m if not x[0].startswith(name_filter)]
def import_sub_modules_under_me(auto_exec_function = "auto_exec"):
m = get_this_module_sub_modules()
for i in m: # need try except later
exec "global %s; import %s" % (i, i)
#this will auto invoke __init__.py if sub modules folder is included
for i in m:
try:
eval(i).eval(auto_exec_function)()
except AttributeError:
print "module %s has no function %s", % (i, auto_exec_function)
else:
print "error on execute %s in module %s", % (auto_exec_function, i)
def execute_all_homonymy_functions(exec_function = "exec"):
m = get_this_module_sub_modules()
for i in m:
#I need here for test if the module has been imported
eval(i).eval(exec_function)()
Here is the
____Template.py
def __you_can_not_see_me(): pass # because filtered by str.startswith()
def auto_exec(): pass # this will be auto executed
def you_can_get_me(): pass
def you_can_get_me1(): pass
def you_can_get_me2(): pass
based on above idea I also want to extend structure to below
main.py
____inspect.py
OpenFunctions\
__init__.py
____Template.py
function1.py
function2.py
......
functionx.py
module_aa
\__init__.py
aa.py
aa1.py
Here is the main.py
while the __init__.py
may looks like
import ____inspect
____inspect.import_sub_modules_under_me()
____inspect.execute_all_homonymy_functions("what_ever_i_want")
Questions:
Above
__init__
code will not working, because thesys.modules[__name__]
is____inspect
when invoking but not theOpenFunctions
ormodule_aa
I want, is there a way to avoid pass thesys.modules[__name__]
to theimport_sub_modules_under_me()
on themain.py
or the__init__.py
?I suppose
execute_all_homonymy_functions()
will execute all the same name function in folder no matter it is exists in a sub module or in a single file, but I want to invoke all and the latest version in case the module new added or the source has been changed runtime. Then I want to use the codeimport aa, reload(aa)
but may be thought as the wrong on below link, any suggestions? The issue I markedI need here for test if the module has been imported
in __inspect.py[http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5027352/how-to-test-if-one-python-module-has-been-imported]
I also want to know the return type of one function in a file before invoking it, it was suggested to attach a decorate on each function. So my plan is:
\n
____decorate.py
def attrs(**kwds):
def decorate(f):
for k in kwds:
setattr(f, k, kwds[k])
return f
return decorate
functionx.py
import ../____decorate.py
@attrs(argument_types=(int, int,),returns=int)
def __you_can_not_see_me(): pass
@attrs(argument_types=(int, int,),returns=int)
def auto_exec(): pass # I will be auto executed
@attrs(argument_types=(int, int,),returns=int)
def you_can_get_me(): pass
@attrs(argument_types=(int, int,),returns=int)
def you_can_get_me1(): pass
@attrs(argument_types=(int, int,),returns=int)
def you_can_get_me2(): pass
Is it works ok for inspect case? Or there’s an better solution?
The last one: below code
exec "global %s; import %s" % (i, i)
eval(i).eval(auto_exec_function)()
looks ugly, any alternative for above two lines?
Thanks for your help.
Rgs, KC