可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
Say I have two maps:
val a = Map(1 -> "one", 2 -> "two", 3 -> "three")
val b = Map(1 -> "un", 2 -> "deux", 3 -> "trois")
I want to merge these maps by key, applying some function to collect the values (in this particular case I want to collect them into a seq, giving:
val c = Map(1 -> Seq("one", "un"), 2->Seq("two", "deux"), 3->Seq("three", "trois"))
It feels like there should be a nice, idiomatic way of doing this - any suggestions? Am happy if the solution involves scalaz.
回答1:
scala.collection.immutable.IntMap
has an intersectionWith
method that does precisely what you want (I believe):
import scala.collection.immutable.IntMap
val a = IntMap(1 -> "one", 2 -> "two", 3 -> "three", 4 -> "four")
val b = IntMap(1 -> "un", 2 -> "deux", 3 -> "trois")
val merged = a.intersectionWith(b, (_, av, bv: String) => Seq(av, bv))
This gives you IntMap(1 -> List(one, un), 2 -> List(two, deux), 3 -> List(three, trois))
. Note that it correctly ignores the key that only occurs in a
.
As a side note: I've often found myself wanting the unionWith
, intersectionWith
, etc. functions from Haskell's Data.Map
in Scala. I don't think there's any principled reason that they should only be available on IntMap
, instead of in the base collection.Map
trait.
回答2:
val a = Map(1 -> "one", 2 -> "two", 3 -> "three")
val b = Map(1 -> "un", 2 -> "deux", 3 -> "trois")
val c = a.toList ++ b.toList
val d = c.groupBy(_._1).map{case(k, v) => k -> v.map(_._2).toSeq}
//res0: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,Seq[java.lang.String]] =
//Map((2,List(two, deux)), (1,List(one, un), (3,List(three, trois)))
回答3:
Scalaz adds a method |+|
for any type A
for which a Semigroup[A]
is available.
If you mapped your Maps so that each value was a single-element sequence, then you could use this quite simply:
scala> a.mapValues(Seq(_)) |+| b.mapValues(Seq(_))
res3: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,Seq[java.lang.String]] = Map(1 -> List(one, un), 2 -> List(two, deux), 3 -> List(three, trois))
回答4:
So I wasn't quite happy with either solution (I want to build a new type, so semigroup doesn't really feel appropriate, and Infinity's solution seemed quite complex), so I've gone with this for the moment. I'd be happy to see it improved:
def merge[A,B,C](a : Map[A,B], b : Map[A,B])(c : (B,B) => C) = {
for (
key <- (a.keySet ++ b.keySet);
aval <- a.get(key); bval <- b.get(key)
) yield c(aval, bval)
}
merge(a,b){Seq(_,_)}
I wanted the behaviour of returning nothing when a key wasn't present in either map (which differs from other solutions), but a way of specifying this would be nice.
回答5:
Here is my first approach before looking for the other solutions:
for (x <- a) yield
x._1 -> Seq (a.get (x._1), b.get (x._1)).flatten
To avoid elements which happen to exist only in a or b, a filter is handy:
(for (x <- a) yield
x._1 -> Seq (a.get (x._1), b.get (x._1)).flatten).filter (_._2.size == 2)
Flatten is needed, because b.get (x._1) returns an Option. To make flatten work, the first element has to be an option too, so we can't just use x._2 here.
For sequences, it works too:
scala> val b = Map (1 -> Seq(1, 11, 111), 2 -> Seq(2, 22), 3 -> Seq(33, 333), 5 -> Seq(55, 5, 5555))
b: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,Seq[Int]] = Map(1 -> List(1, 11, 111), 2 -> List(2, 22), 3 -> List(33, 333), 5 -> List(55, 5, 5555))
scala> val a = Map (1 -> Seq(1, 101), 2 -> Seq(2, 212, 222), 3 -> Seq (3, 3443), 4 -> (44, 4, 41214))
a: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,ScalaObject with Equals] = Map(1 -> List(1, 101), 2 -> List(2, 212, 222), 3 -> List(3, 3443), 4 -> (44,4,41214))
scala> (for (x <- a) yield x._1 -> Seq (a.get (x._1), b.get (x._1)).flatten).filter (_._2.size == 2)
res85: scala.collection.immutable.Map[Int,Seq[ScalaObject with Equals]] = Map(1 -> List(List(1, 101), List(1, 11, 111)), 2 -> List(List(2, 212, 222), List(2, 22)), 3 -> List(List(3, 3443), List(33, 333)))
回答6:
val fr = Map(1 -> "one", 2 -> "two", 3 -> "three")
val en = Map(1 -> "un", 2 -> "deux", 3 -> "trois")
def innerJoin[K, A, B](m1: Map[K, A], m2: Map[K, B]): Map[K, (A, B)] = {
m1.flatMap{ case (k, a) =>
m2.get(k).map(b => Map((k, (a, b)))).getOrElse(Map.empty[K, (A, B)])
}
}
innerJoin(fr, en) // Map(1 -> ("one", "un"), 2 -> ("two", "deux"), 3 -> ("three", "trois")): Map[Int, (String, String)]