Is there any alternative to Bluebird's Promise.try
function. As I'm using async/await
not interested in adding bluebird dependency.
Is there a better way to capture asynchronous error
in Node.JS
await Promise.try(async function() {
// Some code with async operations like readline
await this.nextCall(batchData, true);
}).catch(async function(err) {
// My error handling
});
Any inbuilt functions in Node.js 10.x ?
UPDATE :
Is there a better way to capture asynchronous error
in Node.JS
try {
let interfaceVal = lineReader.createInterface({
input: fs.createReadStream(filePath)
});
interfaceVal.on('line', async (line) => {
throw new Error('My custom Error');
});
// some sync operations
} catch(e) {
// This catch wont get called with custom error
console.log(e);
}
Any idea to capture such asynchronous errors ?
There is no reason to wrap async
function with Promise.try
. The purpose of Promise.try
is to handle both synchronous errors and rejections similarly:
Start the chain of promises with Promise.try. Any synchronous exceptions will be turned into rejections on the returned promise.
This is already done with async
since it always returns a promise.
This can be used at top level with async
IIFE:
(async function() {
await this.nextCall(batchData, true);
})().catch(console.error);
Or in case async
is nested it can be omitted, a rejection can be handled in parent async
function with try..catch
, as another answer explains.
In this case an error can be caught only inside async
function:
interfaceVal.on('line', async (line) => {
try {
throw new Error('My custom Error');
} catch (err) {
console.error(err);
}
});
The use of non-promise API (Node stream) doesn't allow for error handling with promises. Stream callback ignores rejected promises and doesn't allow to propagate the error outside the stream.
Callbacks can be converted to promises only when they are expected to be called once
. This is not the case with line
. In this case asynchronous iterator can be used, this one of its use cases.
Event emitter can be converted to async iterator with p-event
and iterated with for await of
inside async
function:
try {
let interfaceVal = lineReader.createInterface({
input: fs.createReadStream(filePath)
});
const asyncIterator = pEvent.iterator(interfaceVal, 'line', {
resolutionEvents: ['close']
});
for await (const event of asyncIterator) {
console.log('line', event);
// throw new Error('My custom Error');
}
} catch(e) {
console.log(e);
}
Promise.try
is on its way for specification. Here is the polyfill:
if (typeof Promise !== 'function') {
throw new TypeError('A global Promise is required');
}
if (typeof Promise.try !== 'function') {
Promise.try = {
try(func) {
if (typeof this !== 'function') {
throw new TypeError('Receiver must be a constructor');
}
return new this(function (resolve) {
resolve(func());
});
}
}.try;
}
This polyfill supports promise subclassing and other features. This is safe to polyfill in Node.js.
In nodeJs, if you're using async/await you can use plain try catch blocks and it will catch your errors (and it will work for async calls)
try {
await this.nextCall(batchData, true);
}
catch(exc) {
// handle error
}
this function definition needs to be declared as async
You don't need to specify a catch
clause explicitely in an async function, because it uses the natural Error semantics. Here your function operation_A
throws an error, because operation_B
rejected.
const operation_B = () => {
return new Promise((resolve,reject) => {
window.setTimeout(() => {
//resolve("RESOLVE: all your base are belong to us");
reject("REJECT: all your base are belong to us");
},2000);
});
};
const operation_A = async () => {
const B = await operation_B();
return B.toUpperCase();
};
operation_A().then(console.log).catch(console.error);