Is there any difference between staticgenerator and useing Django's CACHE_BACKEND on the filesystem eg. CACHE_BACKEND = 'file:///var/tmp/django_cache' ?
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效,请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
回答1:
Yes.
StaticGenerator
generates static HTML files to bypass Django entirely.
Any caching that django does such as the filesystem cache is still processed by django. A lot of the overhead of running your app is still there: django processes a request, goes through middlewares, checks filesystem cache for content, etc.
With StaticGenerator (and their example), nginx
is serving the index.html
page if it exists and if it doesn't, passes the request on to django on apache.
The idea is to have nginx
blissfully serving some html file that StaticGenerator
updates on state changes (like saving a model).