鉴于以下多例:
public class Multiton
{
private static final Multiton[] instances = new Multiton[...];
private Multiton(...)
{
//...
}
public static Multiton getInstance(int which)
{
if(instances[which] == null)
{
instances[which] = new Multiton(...);
}
return instances[which];
}
}
我们怎样才能保持它的线程安全和懒惰而不getInstance()方法的昂贵同步和双重检查锁定的争议? 对于单身的有效方法是提到这里 ,但似乎并没有延伸到multitons。
这会给你提供一个线程安全的存储机制为您Multitons。 唯一的缺点是,它可以创建不会在的putIfAbsent()调用中使用的多例。 可能性很小,但它存在不存在。 当然遥控器上的机会,它确实发生了,但它仍然不会造成伤害。
从有利的一面,也没有预分配或所需的初始化并没有预定义的大小限制。
private static ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, Multiton> instances = new ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, Multiton>();
public static Multiton getInstance(int which)
{
Multiton result = instances.get(which);
if (result == null)
{
Multiton m = new Multiton(...);
result = instances.putIfAbsent(which, m);
if (result == null)
result = m;
}
return result;
}
更新:与Java 8,也可以是更简单:
public class Multiton {
private static final ConcurrentMap<String, Multiton> multitons = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
private final String key;
private Multiton(String key) { this.key = key; }
public static Multiton getInstance(final String key) {
return multitons.computeIfAbsent(key, Multiton::new);
}
}
嗯,这很好!
原来的答案
这是建立在一溶液中Memoizer图案作为在JCiP描述 。 它采用像其他答案之一ConcurrentHashMap的,但不是直接存储多例的情况下,这可能会导致产生未使用的情况下,它存储导致创建多例的计算。 这额外的层解决了未使用的情况下的问题。
public class Multiton {
private static final ConcurrentMap<Integer, Future<Multiton>> multitons = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
private static final Callable<Multiton> creator = new Callable<Multiton>() {
public Multiton call() { return new Multiton(); }
};
private Multiton(Strnig key) {}
public static Multiton getInstance(final Integer key) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
Future<Multiton> f = multitons.get(key);
if (f == null) {
FutureTask<Multiton> ft = new FutureTask<>(creator);
f = multitons.putIfAbsent(key, ft);
if (f == null) {
f = ft;
ft.run();
}
}
return f.get();
}
}
你可以使用锁定阵列,至少能够得到不同的情况下同时来:
private static final Multiton[] instances = new Multiton[...];
private static final Object[] locks = new Object[instances.length];
static {
for (int i = 0; i < locks.length; i++) {
locks[i] = new Object();
}
}
private Multiton(...) {
//...
}
public static Multiton getInstance(int which) {
synchronized(locks[which]) {
if(instances[which] == null) {
instances[which] = new Multiton(...);
}
return instances[which];
}
}
在Java 8的出现和一些改进ConcurrentMap
和lambda表达式,现在可以实现Multiton
(也许甚至Singleton
在更为整洁时尚):
public class Multiton {
// Map from the index to the item.
private static final ConcurrentMap<Integer, Multiton> multitons = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
private Multiton() {
// Possibly heavy construction.
}
// Get the instance associated with the specified key.
public static Multiton getInstance(final Integer key) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
// Already made?
Multiton m = multitons.get(key);
if (m == null) {
// Put it in - only create if still necessary.
m = multitons.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> new Multiton());
}
return m;
}
}
我怀疑-尽管这会让我感到不舒服-这getInstance
可以进一步减少到:
// Get the instance associated with the specified key.
public static Multiton getInstance(final Integer key) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
// Put it in - only create if still necessary.
return multitons.computeIfAbsent(key, k -> new Multiton());
}
您正在寻找一个AtomicReferenceArray 。
public class Multiton {
private static final AtomicReferenceArray<Multiton> instances = new AtomicReferenceArray<Multiton>(1000);
private Multiton() {
}
public static Multiton getInstance(int which) {
// One there already?
Multiton it = instances.get(which);
if (it == null) {
// Lazy make.
Multiton newIt = new Multiton();
// Successful put?
if ( instances.compareAndSet(which, null, newIt) ) {
// Yes!
it = newIt;
} else {
// One appeared as if by magic (another thread got there first).
it = instances.get(which);
}
}
return it;
}
}