我有这个代码的问题:
__strong NSString *yourString = @"Your String";
__weak NSString *myString = yourString;
yourString = nil;
__unsafe_unretained NSString *theirString = myString;
NSLog(@"%p %@", yourString, yourString);
NSLog(@"%p %@", myString, myString);
NSLog(@"%p %@", theirString, theirString);
我期待所有的指针是nil
,在这个时候,但他们都没有,我不明白为什么。 第一个(强)的指针是nil
,但其他两个不是。 这是为什么?
TL; DR:问题是,字符串常量永远不会被释放,你弱指针仍指向它。
理论
强大的变量将保留它们指向的值。
弱变量不会保留它们的值,当值被释放,他们将自己的指针设置为nil(是安全的)。
不安全不保留值(因为你可能可以通过名字读取)将不保留的价值,如果它得到释放,他们无能为力,可能指向一个坏一块内存
文字和常量
当您使用字符串@"literal string"
就成了一个字符串永不会改变。 如果你在你的应用中有许多地方使用相同的字符串,它始终是同一个对象。 字符串文字不会消失。 使用[[NSString alloc] initWithString:@"literal string"]
不会有所作为。 由于它成为一个指向文本字符串。 然而值得注意的是[[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"literal string"];
工作方式不同,将释放其字符串对象。
逐行:
__strong NSString *yourString = @"Your String";
您正在创建一个强大的指向字符串的指针。 这将确保该值不会消失。 在你的情况下,它是一个有点特殊,因为该字符串是一个字符串字面量,在技术上将不会被释放 。
__weak NSString *myString = yourString;
您创建一个弱指针同样的事情你坚强的指针。 如果在这个时候强指针将指向别的东西,它指向的价值会得到释放,然后使之指向弱指针会改变其值nil
。 现在,它仍然指向相同强劲的指针。
yourString = nil;
你强烈的指针指向nil
。 没有指向旧的字符串,所以应该得到释放,如果它是不是正在为一个字符串的事实 。 如果你试图用你自己创建的其他对象完全一样的东西,弱变量将改变,因此它指向nil
。 但是,因为字符串文字是文字,并不会消失。 弱变量仍然是指向它。
__unsafe_unretained NSString *theirString = myString;
一种新的无保留的指针被创建,指向您这是指向字符串字面弱指针。
NSLog(@"%p %@", yourString, yourString);
NSLog(@"%p %@", myString, myString);
NSLog(@"%p %@", theirString, theirString);
您打印您的所有字符串,并感到困惑,为什么第一个值是nil
,但其他两个不是。
相关阅读:
什么是字符串常量和字符串文字的区别?
大卫在他的回答正确率100%。 我只是说使用四个明确的例子GHUnit 。
寿命预选赛行为对象的引用。
使用NSObject
为所有对象的代理,寿命预选赛的行为预期。
- (void) test_usingNSObjects
{
NSObject *value1 = [[NSObject alloc] init];
NSObject *value2 = [[NSObject alloc] init];
NSObject *value3 = [[NSObject alloc] init];
__strong NSObject *sRefToValue = value1;
__weak NSObject *wRefToValue = value2;
__unsafe_unretained NSObject *uRefToValue = value3;
value1 = value2 = value3 = nil;
GHAssertNotNil(sRefToValue,
@"Strong reference to the object that was originally \
assigned to value1. Even though value1 was set to nil, the \
strong reference to the object keeps the object from being \
destroyed.");
GHAssertNil(wRefToValue,
@"Weak reference to the object that was originally assigned to \
value2. When value2 was set to nil, the weak reference does \
not prevent the object from being destroyed. The weak \
reference is also set to nil.");
// Removing the #ifdef and #endif lines will result in a EXC_BAD_ACCESS
// signal. Receiving a EXC_BAD_ACCESS signal is the expected behavior for
// that code.
#ifdef RECIEVE_EXC_BAD_ACCESS
GHAssertNotNil(uRefToValue,
@"Unsafe unretained reference to the object that was \
originally assigned to value3. When value3 was set to nil, \
the unsafe unretained reference does not prevent the object \
from being destroyed. The unsafe unretained reference is \
unaltered and the reference is invalid. Accessing the \
reference will result in EXC_BAD_ACCESS signal.");
#endif
// To avoid future EXC_BAD_ACCESS signals.
uRefToValue = nil;
}
字面的寿命预选赛行为NSString
S(@“东西”)。
这是基本相同test_usingNSObjects
,但代替使用NSObject
,一个NSString
分配一个文字串被使用。 由于文字字符串不被破坏像其他对象,不同的行为__weak
和__unsafe_unretained
变量观察。
- (void) test_usingLiteralNSStrings
{
NSString *value1 = @"string 1";
NSString *value2 = @"string 2";
NSString *value3 = @"string 3";
__strong NSString *sRefToValue = value1;
__weak NSString *wRefToValue = value2;
__unsafe_unretained NSString *uRefToValue = value3;
value1 = value2 = value3 = nil;
GHAssertNotNil(sRefToValue,
@"Strong reference to the object that was originally \
assigned to value1. Even though value1 was set to nil, \
literal strings are not destroyed.");
GHAssertNotNil(wRefToValue,
@"Weak reference to the object that was originally assigned \
to value2. Even though value2 was set to nil, \
literal strings are not destroyed so the weak reference is \
still valid.");
GHAssertNotNil(uRefToValue,
@"Unsafe unretained reference to the object that was \
originally assigned to value3. Even though value3 was set \
to nil, literal strings are not destroyed so the unsafe \
unretained reference is still valid.");
}
寿命预选赛行为非字面NSString
秒。
这是基本相同test_usingNSObjects
,但代替使用NSObject
,一个NSString
分配一个非字面串被使用。 由于非字面字符串被破坏等其它的目的,行为是在观察到的相同test_usingNSObjects
。
- (void) test_usingNonliteralNSStrings
{
NSString *value1 = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"string 1"];
NSString *value2 = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"string 2"];
NSString *value3 = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"string 3"];
__strong NSString *sRefToValue = value1;
__weak NSString *wRefToValue = value2;
__unsafe_unretained NSString *uRefToValue = value3;
value1 = value2 = value3 = nil;
GHAssertNotNil(sRefToValue,
@"Strong reference to the object that was originally \
assigned to value1. Even though value1 was set to nil, the \
strong reference to the object keeps the object from being \
destroyed.");
GHAssertNil(wRefToValue,
@"Weak reference to the object that was originally assigned to \
value2. When value2 was set to nil, the weak reference does \
not prevent the object from being destroyed. The weak \
reference is also set to nil.");
// Removing the #ifdef and #endif lines will result in a EXC_BAD_ACCESS
// signal. Receiving a EXC_BAD_ACCESS signal is the expected behavior for
// that code.
#ifdef RECIEVE_EXC_BAD_ACCESS
GHAssertNotNil(uRefToValue,
@"Unsafe unretained reference to the object that was \
originally assigned to value3. When value3 was set to nil, \
the unsafe unretained reference does not prevent the object \
from being destroyed. The unsafe unretained reference is \
unaltered and the reference is invalid. Accessing the \
reference will result in EXC_BAD_ACCESS signal.");
#endif
// To avoid future EXC_BAD_ACCESS signals.
uRefToValue = nil;
}
NSString
创作-字面VS非字面。
可见以各种方式创建的字符串,如果它们是文字,也非字面。
- (void) test_stringCreation
{
NSString *literalString = @"literalString";
NSString *referenced = literalString;
NSString *copy = [literalString copy];
NSString *initWithString = [[NSString alloc] initWithString:literalString];
NSString *initWithFormat = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:@"%@", literalString];
// Testing that the memory addresses of referenced objects are the same.
GHAssertEquals(literalString, @"literalString", @"literal");
GHAssertEquals(referenced, @"literalString", @"literal");
GHAssertEquals(copy, @"literalString", @"literal");
GHAssertEquals(initWithString, @"literalString", @"literal");
GHAssertNotEquals(initWithFormat, @"literalString",
@"nonliteral - referenced objects' memory addresses are \
different.");
// Testing that the objects referenced are equal, i.e. isEqual: .
GHAssertEqualObjects(literalString, @"literalString", nil);
GHAssertEqualObjects(referenced, @"literalString", nil);
GHAssertEqualObjects(copy, @"literalString", nil);
GHAssertEqualObjects(initWithString, @"literalString", nil);
GHAssertEqualObjects(initWithFormat, @"literalString", nil);
// Testing that the strings referenced are the same, i.e. isEqualToString: .
GHAssertEqualStrings(literalString, @"literalString", nil);
GHAssertEqualStrings(referenced, @"literalString", nil);
GHAssertEqualStrings(copy, @"literalString", nil);
GHAssertEqualStrings(initWithString, @"literalString", nil);
GHAssertEqualStrings(initWithFormat, @"literalString", nil);
}
自动释放池倒掉弱属性将仅被设置为零。
尝试:
@autoreleasepool {
_strong NSString *yourString = @"Your String";
__weak NSString *myString = yourString;
yourString = nil;
__unsafe_unretained NSString *theirString = myString;
}
NSLog(@"%p %@", yourString, yourString);
NSLog(@"%p %@", myString, myString);
NSLog(@"%p %@", theirString, theirString);
文章来源: Weak NSString variable is not nil after setting the only strong reference to nil